Quarantine Plasma: Quo vadis?

Abstract

Upon the introduction of mandatory nucleic acid amplification technology (NAT) testing in Germany for HCV, quarantining of fresh frozen plasma (FFP) was reduced in 2002 from 6 to 4 months. In 2004 HIV-1 NAT and in 2005 anti-HBc testing were introduced to further reduce the residual transmission risks for transfusion relevant viruses. After testing more than 40 million donations by HCV NAT it became obvious that NAT testing has a very significant impact on viral blood safety by reducing the residual risk by a factor of 10. Only one documented HCV transmission occurred during more than 10 years of NAT testing in Germany, indicating that the remaining risk is marginal. Similar data were obtained for HIV-1. The question arises whether we could discontinue quarantining of FFP or further reduce the quarantining interval for retesting of the donor. This could facilitate logistics and reduce losses as quarantine FFP can be released earlier after donation and at regular donation intervals. Essential parameters for estimating the remaining infectious risks are the minimal infectious dose and replication kinetics of the viruses involved, the detection limits of the NAT tests applied, and the volume of plasma transfused. In essence it can be assumed that discontinuation of quarantining would only marginally increase the residual risk and that the reduction of the quarantine period to only 4 weeks would add an additional benefit to the viral safety of quarantine FFP.