Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2010 Oct;32(8):725-30.
doi: 10.1007/s00276-010-0682-9. Epub 2010 Jun 25.

Accuracy and reliability of different methods to evaluate the acetabular cup version from plain radiographs

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Accuracy and reliability of different methods to evaluate the acetabular cup version from plain radiographs

Maximilian Haenle et al. Surg Radiol Anat. 2010 Oct.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare different methods of evaluating the version of a metallic acetabular cup from plain radiographs and to compare them regarding their accuracy, inter- and intra-observer reliability.

Methods: Conventional anterior-posterior radiographs were taken of a phantom-model at different defined ante- and retroversion angles of the acetabular cup. The version angles of the acetabular cup were derived according to four different established methods from the radiographs by five independent examiners.

Results: We were able to determine the radiographic version with the greatest accuracy according to a modified technique of Pettersson et al. Furthermore, we found the highest intra- and inter-observer reliability using this technique.

Conclusions: A modified technique of Pettersson et al. broadens the spectrum of applicability for the radiographic evaluation of the version angle of metal-backed acetabular cups in comparison to the originally introduced method. In clinical practice, however, the significance of deriving the cup position from standard radiographs should not be over-estimated and therefore a computed tomography should be performed in certain critical cases.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Skeletal Radiol. 2008 Dec;37(12):1119-27 - PubMed
    1. Int Orthop. 2006 Feb;30(1):26-30 - PubMed
    1. Acta Orthop Scand. 2004 Jun;75(3):252-60 - PubMed
    1. J Arthroplasty. 2008 Jan;23(1):51-6 - PubMed
    1. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999 May;81(3):431-5 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources