Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Mar;26(1):103-10.
doi: 10.1007/s13187-010-0133-7.

The relationship of health numeracy to cancer screening

Affiliations

The relationship of health numeracy to cancer screening

Marilyn M Schapira et al. J Cancer Educ. 2011 Mar.

Abstract

Health numeracy is associated with increased understanding of cancer risk reduction information and improved control of chronic disease. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among a primary care population to evaluate the effect of health numeracy on breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening. No association was found between health numeracy and cancer screening. However, at a baseline screening rate of 85%, increased knowledge (RR 1.06, 95% CI 1.02-1.08) and decreased perceived barriers (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.92-0.95) were associated with increased screening rates. In conclusion, health numeracy was not predictive of cancer screening among a primary care population.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Unadjusted Associations of Individual Characteristics with Cancer Screening
Association of participant characteristics with cancer screening in accordance with guidelines adjusted for cancer type and clustering due to multiple cancer eligibilities per subject. Odds ratios were converted to relative risks using a baseline adherence rate of 0.85, the observed overall rate. The p-value for the 2 degree of freedom test for education was 0.005, and for income was 0.056. See Table 2 for definitions of education and income levels.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Adjusted Associations of Individual Characteristics with Cancer Screening
Association of participant characteristics with cancer screening in accordance with guidelines adjusted for cancer type, clustering due to multiple cancer eligibilities per subject, knowledge about screening guidelines, and perceived barriers to cancer screening. Odds ratios were converted to relative risks using a baseline adherence rate of 0.85, the observed overall rate. The p-value for the two degree of freedom test for education was 0.06 and for income was 0.68. See Table 2 for definitions of education and income levels.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Schwartz LM, Woloshin S, Fowler FJ, et al. Enthusiasm for cancer screening in the United States. JAMA. 2004;291:71–78. - PubMed
    1. Kupets R, Covens A. Strategies for the implementation of cervical and breast cancer screening of women by primary care physicians. Gynecol Oncol. 2001;83:186–197. - PubMed
    1. Swan J, Breen N, Coates RJ, et al. Progress in cancer screening practices in the United States. Cancer. 2003;97:1528–1540. - PubMed
    1. Davis T, Dolan N, Ferreira MR, et al. The role of inadequate health literacy skills in colorectal cancer screening. Cancer Invest. 2001:193–200. - PubMed
    1. Rogers ES, Wallace LS, Weiss B. Misperceptions of medical understanding in low-literacy patients: implications for cancer prevention. Cancer Control. 2006;13:225–229. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms