Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010 Jul;51(6):659-68.
doi: 10.1002/em.20603.

Interstrand crosslink inducing agents in pretransplant conditioning therapy for hematologic malignancies

Affiliations
Review

Interstrand crosslink inducing agents in pretransplant conditioning therapy for hematologic malignancies

Benigno C Valdez et al. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2010 Jul.

Abstract

Despite successful molecularly targeted, highly specific, therapies for hematologic malignancies, the DNA interstrand crosslinking agents, which are among the oldest and least specific cytotoxic drugs, still have an important role. This is particularly true in stem cell transplantation, where virtually every patient receives conditioning therapy with a DNA-alkylating agent-based program. However, due to concern about serious additive toxicities with combinations of different alkylating drugs, the last several years have seen nucleoside analogs, whose cytotoxic action follows vastly different molecular pathways, introduced in combination with alkylating agents. The mechanistic differences paired with different metabolic pathways for the respective drugs have clinically translated into increased safety without appreciable loss of antileukemic activity. In this report, we review pre-clinical evidence for synergistic antileukemic activity when nucleoside analog(s) and DNA-alkylating agent(s) are combined in the most appropriate manner(s), without a measurable decrease in clinical efficacy compared with the more established alkylating agent combinations. Data from our own laboratory using combinations of fludarabine, clofarabine, and busulfan as prototype representatives for these respective classes of cytotoxic agents are combined with information from other investigators to explain how the observed molecular events will result in greatly enhanced synergistic cytotoxicity. We further present possible mechanistic pathways for such desirable cytotoxic synergism. Finally, we propose how this information-backed hypothesis can be incorporated in the design of the next generation conditioning therapy programs in stem cell transplantation to optimize antileukemic efficacy while still safeguarding patient safety.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Suggested mechanism of synergistic cytotoxicity of clofarabine (Clo), fludarabine (Flu), and busulfan (Bu). Clo and Flu are taken up by cells and phosphorylated by kinases to their triphosphate forms (Clo-TP and Flu-TP), which are incorporated into growing DNA strands during replication. Clo and Flu inhibit ribonucleotide reductase (RR) and cause a decrease in the dCTP pool. As dCTP is an inhibitor of deoxycytidine kinase (DCK), a decrease in its concentration may result in activation of DCK, preferential phosphorylation of Clo and Flu, and increased inclusion of these analogs into nascent DNA strands. The incorporation of nucleoside analogs into DNA strands triggers DNA damage responses including DNA repair and histone modifications. Modified histones cause chromatin remodeling and better accessibility of genomic DNA to Bu crosslinking, which propagates DNA damage responses and the cycle continues. The inability of cells to repair DNA damage triggers apoptosis.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Agura E, Berryman RB, Luis P, Estil V, Tadic-Ovcina M, Woelfel R, Fay J. Preliminary results of Phase II trial of clofarabine with parenteral busulfan (Clo/Bu) followed by allogeneic related or unrelated donor transplantation for the treatment of hematologic malignancies. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2010;16:S280.
    1. Alyea EP, Kim HT, Ho V, Cutler C, Gribben J, DeAngelo DJ, Lee SJ, Windawi S, Ritz J, Stone RM, Antin JH, Soiffer RJ. Comparative outcome of nonmyeloablative and myeloablative hematopoietic cell transplantation for patients older than 50 years of age. Blood. 2005;105:1810–1814. - PubMed
    1. Andersson BS, Madden T, Tran HT, Hu WW, Blume KG, Chow DS, Champlin RE, Vaughan WP. Acute safety and pharmacokinetics of intravenous busulfan when used with oral busulfan and cyclophosphamide as pretransplant conditioning therapy: A phase I study. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2000;6:548–554. - PubMed
    1. Andersson BS, Thall PF, Madden T, Couriel D, Wang X, Tran HT, Anderlini P, de Lima M, Gajewski J, Champlin RE. Busulfan systemic exposure relative to regimen-related toxicity and acute graft-versus-host disease: Defining a therapeutic window for i.v. BuCy2 in chronic myelogenous leukemia. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2002a;8:477–485. - PubMed
    1. Andersson BS, Kashyap A, Gian V, Wingard JR, Fernandez H, Cagnoni PJ, Jones RB, Tarantolo S, Hu WW, Blume KG, Forman SJ, Champlin RE. Conditioning therapy with intravenous busulfan and cyclophosphamide (IV BuCy2) for hematologic malignancies prior to allogeneic stem cell transplantation: A phase II study. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2002b;8:145–154. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms