Posterior occlusion changes with a Hawley vs Perfector and Hawley retainer. A follow-up study
- PMID: 20578855
- PMCID: PMC8939024
- DOI: 10.2319/090109-496.1
Posterior occlusion changes with a Hawley vs Perfector and Hawley retainer. A follow-up study
Abstract
Objective: To characterize postorthodontic settling of the posterior occlusion of patients wearing Hawley retainers vs patients who initially wore Perfector retainers and then switched to Hawley retainers.
Materials and methods: This follow-up study was based on 40 patients (25 Perfector and 15 Hawley), who were part of a larger sample of 50 patients randomly assigned to wear either Hawley or Perfector retainers. The Perfector patients were given Hawley retainers 2 months after retainer delivery. Occlusal bite registrations were scanned and traced to quantify posterior areas of contact and near contact (ACNC). A seven-item questionnaire was used to assess the patient's perception of occlusion. Measurements were obtained at the on the day of retainer delivery, 2 months post delivery, 6 months post delivery, and 8 months post delivery.
Results: ACNC increased significantly (P < .05) during the first 6 months of retainer wear. The ACNC of the Hawley and Perfector/Hawley groups increased by 129% and 105%, respectively, over 8 months of retention. The greatest increases in ACNC occurred during the first 2 months. The ACNC further increased between 2 and 6 months in both groups. The Perfector/Hawley group also showed slight increases in ACNC between 6 and 8 months. Overall group differences were not statistically significant. The Perfector/Hawley group perceived greater improvements in occlusion than the Hawley group, but group differences after 8 months were small.
Conclusions: Substantial amounts of settling occurred at decelerating rates during the first 6 months after retainer delivery. No significant differences in ACNC were found between the Hawley and Perfector/Hawley groups after 8 months of retainer wear.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Comparison of the effects of Hawley and perfector/spring aligner retainers on postorthodontic occlusion.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Jun;135(6):729-36. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.05.022. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009. PMID: 19524832 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of occlusal contacts with use of Hawley and clear overlay retainers.Angle Orthod. 1997;67(3):223-30. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1997)067<0223:COOCWU>2.3.CO;2. Angle Orthod. 1997. PMID: 9188967
-
Occlusal contact area changes with different retention protocols: 1-year follow-up.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2020 Apr;157(4):533-541. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.05.020. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2020. PMID: 32241360
-
The origin and evolution of the Hawley retainer for the effectiveness to maintain tooth position after fixed orthodontic treatment compare to vacuum-formed retainer: A systematic review of RCTs.Int Orthod. 2020 Jun;18(2):225-236. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2020.02.008. Epub 2020 Mar 19. Int Orthod. 2020. PMID: 32201168
-
Performance of Hawley-type retainers: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials.Eur J Orthod. 2018 Apr 6;40(2):115-125. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjx036. Eur J Orthod. 2018. PMID: 28549122
Cited by
-
Retention procedures for stabilising tooth position after treatment with orthodontic braces.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 May 22;5(5):CD002283. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002283.pub5. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023. PMID: 37219527 Free PMC article.
-
Changes in the distribution of occlusal forces in the course of the orthodontic retention phase : A prospective cohort study.J Orofac Orthop. 2025 Mar;86(2):1-13. doi: 10.1007/s00056-023-00480-4. Epub 2023 Jun 29. J Orofac Orthop. 2025. PMID: 37382657 Free PMC article.
-
The effects of fixed and removable orthodontic retainers: a systematic review.Prog Orthod. 2016 Dec;17(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s40510-016-0137-x. Epub 2016 Jul 26. Prog Orthod. 2016. PMID: 27459974 Free PMC article.
-
The Impact of Clear Aligner Treatment in Masticatory Function and Temporomandibular Disorders: A Clinical Cohort Pilot Study.Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jun 27;13(13):1541. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13131541. Healthcare (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40648566 Free PMC article.
-
Retention procedures for stabilising tooth position after treatment with orthodontic braces.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jan 29;2016(1):CD002283. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002283.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 May 22;5:CD002283. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002283.pub5. PMID: 26824885 Free PMC article. Updated.
References
-
- Okeson J. Management of Temporomandibular Disorders and Occlusions. St Louis, Mo: CV Mosby; 2003.
-
- Yurkstas A. A. The masticatory act: a review. J Prosthet Dent. 1965;15:248–262. - PubMed
-
- Yurkstas A. A, Manly R. Measurement of occlusal contact area effective in mastication. Am J Orthod. 1949;35:185–195. - PubMed
-
- Owens S, Buschang P. H, Throckmorton G. S, Palmer L, English J. Masticatory performance and areas of occlusal contact and near contact in subjects with normal occlusion and malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002;121:602–609. - PubMed
-
- Ikebe K, Matsuda K, Morii K, Furuya-Yoshinaka M, Nokubi T, Renner R. Association of masticatory performance with age, posterior occlusal contacts, occlusal force and salivary flow in older adults. Int J Prosthodont. 2006;19:475–481. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources