Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2010 Sep;80(5):919-24.
doi: 10.2319/112609-672.1.

Dental archforms in dentoalveolar Class I, II and III

Martina Slaj  1 , Stjepan Spalj, Dubravko Pavlin, Davor Illes, Mladen Slaj
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Dental archforms in dentoalveolar Class I, II and III

Martina Slaj et al. Angle Orthod. 2010 Sep.

Abstract

Objective: To test the hypothesis that no differences exist in dental arch dimensions between dentoalveolar Classes I, II, and III, and between male and female subjects, as measured on virtual three-dimensional (3D) models.

Materials and methods: Samples included randomly selected plaster dental casts of 137 white patients (43 Class I, 50 Class II, and 44 Class III) from the Department of Orthodontics, School of Dental Medicine, University of Zagreb, Croatia. Dental models were scanned and digitized using ATOS II SO ("Small Objects") scanning technology (GOM mbH, Braunschweig, Germany). Eight linear and two proportional measurements were calculated for both upper and lower dental arches.

Results: In men, a significant difference in the upper dental arch was present in the incisor region, and in the lower dental arch, differences were found in intercanine and intermolar widths (P < .05). Significant differences were noted between male groups in the upper molar depth dimension (P = .022) and in the lower molar and canine depth dimensions (P < .05). Class III males had the greatest lower molar and canine width/depth ratios and the smallest lower canine depth/molar depth ratio. Class III women had wider and shorter mandibular arches when compared with Class I and Class II females.

Conclusion: The hypothesis was rejected. The dimensions of the dental arches are related to gender and to dentoalveolar class. Class I and II subjects have similar dimensions of maxillary dental arch, but Class II subjects have a transverse deficit in the mandible. In Class III subjects, the maxillary dental arch is insufficient in transverse and sagittal dimensions, and the mandibular arch dominates in the transverse but not in the sagittal dimension.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Virtual 3D model.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Approximation of measurement points in the upper (U) dental arch in Class I, II, and III in males (M) and females (F).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Approximation of measurement points in the lower (L) dental arch in Class I, II, and III in males (M) and females (F).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Pepe S. H. Polynomial and catenary curve fits to human dental arches. J Dent Res. 1975;54:1124–1132. - PubMed
    1. Ferrario V. F, Sforza C, Miani A, Jr, Tartaglia G. Human dental arch shape evaluated by Euclidean-distance matrix analysis. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1993;90:445–453. - PubMed
    1. Cassidy K. M, Harris E. F, Tolley E. A, Keim R. G. Genetic influence on dental arch form in orthodontic patients. Angle Orthod. 1998;68:445–454. - PubMed
    1. Ferrario V. F, Sforza C, Miani A, Jr, Tartaglia G. Mathematical definition of the shape of dental arches in human permanent healthy dentitions. Eur J Orthod. 1994;16:287–294. - PubMed
    1. Braun S, Hnat W. P, Fender D. E, Legan H. L. The form of the human dental arch. Angle Orthod. 1998;68:29–36. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources