The place of endoscopic ultrasound in bilio-pancreatic pathology
- PMID: 20579826
- DOI: 10.1016/j.gcb.2010.05.004
The place of endoscopic ultrasound in bilio-pancreatic pathology
Abstract
The place of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in malignant pathology of the pancreas is two-fold: (1) EUS is the best examination for the diagnosis of small tumours (<3cm in diameter). Its sensitivity is greater than that of CT scan, percutaneous ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and is equal to that of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) without sharing its invasive character; (2) EUS is also indicated in the assessment of locoregional extension of tumours judged resectable by tomodensitometric (TDM) (scanner) data. The performance of EUS seems to be greater than other imaging techniques for the diagnosis of vascular and lymph node invasion although recent studies report less good results than those of studies in 1992 to 1994, particularly for vascular involvement. Nevertheless, EUS cannot affirm the malignant or benign character of these pancreatic masses. The development over the last 20 years of linear sector-based EUS has enabled us to perform guided biopsies of such lesions. EUS-guided biopsy is today the best technique for obtaining the histology of a pancreatic mass, with a sensitivity of 85 to 87%. Furthermore, it also has a non-negligible impact on the deciding the treatment particularly in the case of adenocarcinomas (ADKP) not visible to TDM (scanners). This is currently of importance because trials are being developed of preoperative radio-chemotherapy for resectable lesions. probably in the next future, contrast-enhanced EUS (CE-EUS) and elastography will improve the results of EUS and will be necessary for a precise local staging before treatment.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Quantitative contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography for the discrimination of solid pancreatic masses.Ultraschall Med. 2010 Dec;31(6):571-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1245833. Epub 2010 Nov 15. Ultraschall Med. 2010. PMID: 21080306
-
Indications for endoscopic ultrasound and diagnosis on fine-needle aspiration and cytology.J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2009 Apr;19(4):223-7. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2009. PMID: 19356336
-
Contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound and elastosonoendoscopy.Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2009;23(5):767-79. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2009.05.004. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2009. PMID: 19744639 Review.
-
Endoscopic ultrasound elastography.Pancreatology. 2011;11 Suppl 2:34-9. doi: 10.1159/000323496. Epub 2011 Apr 5. Pancreatology. 2011. PMID: 21464585
-
Endoscopic ultrasound elastography: Current status and future perspectives.World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Dec 21;21(47):13212-24. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i47.13212. World J Gastroenterol. 2015. PMID: 26715804 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasonography in digestive diseases.J Gastroenterol. 2012 Oct;47(10):1063-72. doi: 10.1007/s00535-012-0662-4. Epub 2012 Sep 25. J Gastroenterol. 2012. PMID: 23001249 Review.
-
The expanding role of endoscopic ultrasound elastography.Clin J Gastroenterol. 2022 Oct;15(5):841-858. doi: 10.1007/s12328-022-01662-0. Epub 2022 Jul 5. Clin J Gastroenterol. 2022. PMID: 35789474 Review.
-
Endoscopic ultrasound elastography for differential diagnosis of pancreatic masses: a meta-analysis.Dig Dis Sci. 2013 Apr;58(4):1125-31. doi: 10.1007/s10620-012-2428-5. Epub 2013 Jan 10. Dig Dis Sci. 2013. PMID: 23306838
-
Gastric foregut cystic developmental malformation: case series and literature review.World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jan 14;21(2):432-8. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i2.432. World J Gastroenterol. 2015. PMID: 25593458 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Solitary pancreatic metastasis from renal cell carcinoma 6 years after nephrectomy.Endosc Ultrasound. 2013 Oct;2(4):222-4. doi: 10.4103/2303-9027.121248. Endosc Ultrasound. 2013. PMID: 24949400 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical