Validation of the Patient Care Monitor (Version 2.0): a review of system assessment instrument for cancer patients
- PMID: 20579839
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.01.017
Validation of the Patient Care Monitor (Version 2.0): a review of system assessment instrument for cancer patients
Abstract
Context: The Patient Care Monitor (PCM) is a review of systems survey delivered by means of an electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePRO) data capture system that uses wireless tablet computers. Although the PCM 1.0 is validated, the updated PCM 2.0 has not been validated nor tested in the academic setting.
Objectives: To validate and test the PCM 2.0 in three cancer populations.
Methods: Two hundred seventy-five individuals participated in three clinical trials enrolling breast (n=65), gastrointestinal (n=113), and lung (n=97) cancer patients. Internal consistency was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha coefficients calculated for six PCM subscales (general physical symptoms, treatment side effects, distress, despair, impaired performance, and impaired ambulation) and a Quality-of-Life Index. Construct validity was evaluated through Pearson's correlation between PCM subscales and subscales of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy--General (FACT-G), the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI), and the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy--Fatigue (FACIT-F). The participants had the following characteristics: mean age was 58 years (standard deviation: 11), 52% were females, 79% were whites, 17% were blacks, 62% had no college degree, and 78% had metastatic or recurrent disease.
Results: Raw and normalized scores for PCM 2.0 subscales were internally consistent across study cohorts. PCM 2.0 subscales correlated significantly (P<0.05) with the corresponding subscales on FACT-G, MDASI, and FACIT-F, with the exception of FACT-G social well-being, particularly for the lung cancer population. These correlations demonstrated construct validity. PCM 2.0 results followed expected patterns by cancer etiology. Prior reports demonstrate patient satisfaction with PCM 2.0.
Conclusion: Within three unique academic oncology populations, PCM 2.0 is a valid ePRO instrument for assessing symptoms with seven patient-centered subscale or index domains.
Copyright © 2010 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Electronic patient-reported data capture as a foundation of rapid learning cancer care.Med Care. 2010 Jun;48(6 Suppl):S32-8. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181db53a4. Med Care. 2010. PMID: 20473201
-
Feasibility and acceptability to patients of a longitudinal system for evaluating cancer-related symptoms and quality of life: pilot study of an e/Tablet data-collection system in academic oncology.J Pain Symptom Manage. 2009 Jun;37(6):1027-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2008.07.011. Epub 2009 Apr 25. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2009. PMID: 19394793 Clinical Trial.
-
Minimally important difference for patient-reported outcomes in psoriatic arthritis: Health Assessment Questionnaire and pain, fatigue, and global visual analog scales.J Rheumatol. 2010 May;37(5):1024-8. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.090832. Epub 2010 Mar 15. J Rheumatol. 2010. PMID: 20231193
-
Electronic patient-reported outcome systems in oncology clinical practice.CA Cancer J Clin. 2012 Sep-Oct;62(5):337-47. doi: 10.3322/caac.21150. Epub 2012 Jul 18. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012. PMID: 22811342 Review.
-
Outcome assessment in lumbar spine surgery.Acta Orthop Suppl. 2005 Jun;76(318):5-47. Acta Orthop Suppl. 2005. PMID: 16175972 Review.
Cited by
-
[The benefits of using patient-reported outcomes in cancer treatment: an overview].Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2012 May;124(9-10):293-303. doi: 10.1007/s00508-012-0168-3. Epub 2012 Apr 27. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2012. PMID: 22538839 Review. German.
-
Understanding Sexual Help-Seeking for Women With Breast Cancer: What Distinguishes Women Who Seek Help From Those Who Do Not?J Sex Med. 2020 Sep;17(9):1729-1739. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2020.06.004. Epub 2020 Jul 12. J Sex Med. 2020. PMID: 32669247 Free PMC article.
-
A behavioral cancer pain intervention: A randomized noninferiority trial comparing in-person with videoconference delivery.Psychooncology. 2019 Aug;28(8):1671-1678. doi: 10.1002/pon.5141. Epub 2019 Jun 19. Psychooncology. 2019. PMID: 31162756 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy of a couple-based intervention addressing sexual concerns for breast cancer survivors: Results of a randomized controlled trial.Cancer. 2025 Jan 1;131(1):e35685. doi: 10.1002/cncr.35685. Epub 2024 Dec 8. Cancer. 2025. PMID: 39645589 Clinical Trial.
-
Palliative oncology: identity, progress, and the path ahead.Ann Oncol. 2012 Apr;23 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):43-8. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mds087. Ann Oncol. 2012. PMID: 22628415 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical