Uterine artery embolization vs hysterectomy in the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids: 5-year outcome from the randomized EMMY trial
- PMID: 20579960
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.01.049
Uterine artery embolization vs hysterectomy in the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids: 5-year outcome from the randomized EMMY trial
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcome and health related quality of life (HRQOL) 5 years after uterine artery embolization (UAE) or hysterectomy in the treatment of menorrhagia caused by uterine fibroids.
Study design: Patients with symptomatic uterine fibroids who were eligible for hysterectomy were assigned randomly 1:1 to hysterectomy or UAE. Endpoints after 5 years were reintervention rates, menorrhagia, and HRQOL measures that were assessed by validated questionnaires.
Results: Patients were assigned randomly to UAE (n = 88) or hysterectomy (n = 89). Five years after treatment 23 of 81 UAE patients (28.4%) had undergone a hysterectomy because of insufficient improvement of complaints (24.7% after successful UAE). HRQOL measures improved significantly and remained stable until the 5-year follow-up evaluation, with no differences between the groups. UAE had a positive effect both on urinary and defecation function.
Conclusion: UAE is a well-established alternative to hysterectomy about which patients should be counseled.
Copyright (c) 2010. Published by Mosby, Inc.
Comment in
-
Discussion: 'Treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids' by van der Kooij et al.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Aug;203(2):e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.05.017. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010. PMID: 20659601
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
