Delivery route preferences of urban women of low socioeconomic status
- PMID: 20579999
- PMCID: PMC3046369
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.04.034
Delivery route preferences of urban women of low socioeconomic status
Abstract
Objective: To identify the main determinants of mode of delivery preference among urban dwelling women of lower socioeconomic status (SES).
Methods: Over a 12-month period, a self-completion 36-item questionnaire was administered to a convenience sample of 308 women within the first 3 postpartum days. Non-parametric tests were used for analysis.
Results: Study participants were mostly African American (>85%), single mothers (>75%), and unemployed (≥55%). Among the women, 85.7% had vaginal delivery (VD) and 14.3% had cesarean delivery (CD). Women who preferred CD (10%) were more likely to be concerned about a vaginal tear/episiotomy during VD, forceps, and a "big" baby compared with women who preferred VD, for whom "pushing the baby out myself" and "fear of cesarean" were the most important factors. In the final model of 7 factors, the 3 main factors found to positively impact maternal preference for CD were a vaginal cut during VD (P<0.001), higher mean BMI (P=0.001), and cesarean as the most recent delivery type (P<0.001). The total explained variance by this model was 46%.
Conclusions: Short-term complications of a VD, higher BMI, and a previous cesarean delivery are the most significant factors that impact the preferences of women of lower SES for future mode of delivery.
Copyright © 2010 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no conflicts of interest.
Similar articles
-
Preference toward future mode of delivery: how do antepartum preferences and prior delivery experience contribute?J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015;28(14):1673-8. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2014.964674. Epub 2014 Oct 6. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015. PMID: 25212977
-
Mode of delivery and postpartum depression: the role of patient preferences.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Feb;212(2):229.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.09.002. Epub 2014 Sep 9. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015. PMID: 25218957
-
Risk factors for primary and subsequent anal sphincter lacerations: a comparison of cohorts by parity and prior mode of delivery.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Apr;196(4):344.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.10.893. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007. PMID: 17403415
-
Chilean women's preferences regarding mode of delivery: which do they prefer and why?BJOG. 2006 Nov;113(11):1253-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01069.x. Epub 2006 Oct 2. BJOG. 2006. PMID: 17014679
-
Cesarean delivery to prevent anal incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Tech Coloproctol. 2019 Sep;23(9):809-820. doi: 10.1007/s10151-019-02029-3. Epub 2019 Jul 4. Tech Coloproctol. 2019. PMID: 31273486
References
-
- Meikle SF, Steiner CA, Zhang J, Lawrence Wl. A national estimate of the elective primary cesarean delivery rate. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105(4):751–6. - PubMed
-
- Gossman GL, Joesch JM, Tanfer K. Trends in maternal request cesarean delivery from 1991 to 2004. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108(6):1506–16. - PubMed
-
- O’Boyle AL, O’Boyle JD, Calhoun B, Davis JD. Pelvic organ support in pregnancy and postpartum. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunc. 2005;16(1):69–72. - PubMed
-
- Landon MB, Spong CY, Thom E, Hauth JC, Bloom SL, Varner MW, et al. Risk of uterine rupture with a trial of labor in women with multiple and single prior cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108(1):12–20. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical