Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010 Nov 1;316(18):3007-13.
doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2010.05.018. Epub 2010 May 24.

Myoblast fusion in Drosophila

Affiliations
Review

Myoblast fusion in Drosophila

Shruti Haralalka et al. Exp Cell Res. .

Abstract

The body wall musculature of a Drosophila larva is composed of an intricate pattern of 30 segmentally repeated muscle fibers in each abdominal hemisegment. Each muscle fiber has unique spatial and behavioral characteristics that include its location, orientation, epidermal attachment, size and pattern of innervation. Many, if not all, of these properties are dictated by founder cells, which determine the muscle pattern and seed the fusion process. Myofibers are then derived from fusion between a specific founder cell and several fusion competent myoblasts (FCMs) fusing with as few as 3-5 FCMs in the small muscles on the most ventral side of the embryo and as many as 30 FCMs in the larger muscles on the dorsal side of the embryo. The focus of the present review is the formation of the larval muscles in the developing embryo, summarizing the major issues and players in this process. We have attempted to emphasize experimentally-validated details of the mechanism of myoblast fusion and distinguish these from the theoretically possible details that have not yet been confirmed experimentally. We also direct the interested reader to other recent reviews that discuss myoblast fusion in Drosophila, each with their own perspective on the process [1-4]. With apologies, we use gene nomenclature as specified by Flybase (http://flybase.org) but provide Table 1 with alternative names and references.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig.1
Fig.1. A model representing proteins required for Drosophila myoblast fusion
Colored boxes represent gene products in which the loss-of-function phenotype is associated with myoblast fusion. White boxes and dashed arrows represent protein interactions that have been observed in S2 cells. Transparent boxes denote proteins in which overexpression of a dominant negative transgene impacts myoblast fusion, but null alleles have no apparent defects. Proteins without boxes have the potential for a role in myoblast fusion, based on the interactions or phenotypes of their vertebrate counterparts. Solid arrows represent interactions observed in the embryonic musculature. In all cases, see text for details.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Zhang S, Chen EH. Ultrastructural analysis of myoblast fusion in Drosophila. Methods Mol. Biol. 2008;475:275–297. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rochlin K YS, Roy S, Baylies MK. Myoblast fusion: When it takes more to make one. Dev. Biol. 2010;341:66–83. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Onel SF, Renkawitz-Pohl R. FuRMAS: triggering myoblast fusion in Drosophila. Dev. Dyn. 2009;238:1513–1525. - PubMed
    1. Abmayr SM, Zhuang S, Geisbrecht ER. Myoblast fusion in Drosophila. Methods Mol. Biol. 2008;475:75–97. - PubMed
    1. Abmayr SM, Balagopalan L, Galletta BJ, Hong SJ, Lawrence IG, Kostas I, Sarjeet SG. Comprehensive Molecular Insect Science. Elsevier; Amsterdam: 2005. Myogenesis and Muscle Development; pp. 1–43.

LinkOut - more resources