Cumulative effect of vagus nerve stimulators on intractable seizures observed over a period of 3years
- PMID: 20580901
- DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2010.04.008
Cumulative effect of vagus nerve stimulators on intractable seizures observed over a period of 3years
Abstract
Objective: The objective of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of vagus nerve stimulator (VNS) therapy and identify factors associated with reduction of seizures. The VNS is an accepted therapeutic option for patients with refractory partial epilepsy. There are, however, limited data regarding efficacy in any specific group of patients with epilepsy.
Methods: This is a retrospective review of patients with epilepsy on VNS therapy initiated between January 2000 and December 2007 at a university medical center. Information collected included demographics, epilepsy type and duration, antiepileptic drug usage, stimulation parameters, and seizure frequency at baseline, 3months, 6months, 1year, 2years, and 3years after VNS therapy initiation. Seizure frequency at different follow-up intervals was compared with baseline frequency. Patients were stratified into three subsets based on VNS response. Relationships between VNS response and factors including demographics, location of seizure focus, type or duration of epilepsy, and VNS settings were examined as a whole as well as in subsets.
Results: Fifty-four patients were implanted with VNSs over a period of 7years. Four patients were excluded. A total of 50 patients (31 men, 19 women) with mean age 39years and on VNS therapy were included in this study. Average duration of VNS therapy was 4.5years. Baseline average frequency was 10 seizures per month. Significant decreases in median seizure frequency were noted at 3months (P<0.001), 6months (P<0.001), 1year (P=0.004), 2years (P<0.001), and 3years (P<0.0001). Seventy-two percent of the patients reported a decrease in seizure frequency within the first 3months, which increased to 80% by the end of 3years. Overall, the percentage reduction in seizure frequency was 64% at 3months and increased to 86% at the end of 3years. In the subset of patients who responded to VNSs, reduction in seizure frequency improved from 80 to 89% by the end of 3years. There were no correlations between seizure frequency and specific VNS settings, epileptic focus, or duration or type of epilepsy, in the group as a whole or in its subsets. Data suggest a favorable VNS response in patients with higher baseline seizure frequency.
Conclusions: Significant reductions in seizure frequency were noted with VNS therapy over a 3-year follow-up period with a possible cumulative effect. Lateralization or localization of epileptic focus or epilepsy subtype did not correlate with response to VNSs.
Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Refractory epilepsy in tuberous sclerosis: vagus nerve stimulation with or without subsequent resective surgery.Epilepsy Behav. 2009 Nov;16(3):454-60. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2009.08.018. Epub 2009 Sep 19. Epilepsy Behav. 2009. PMID: 19767244 Clinical Trial.
-
The efficacy of vagal nerve stimulation in children with pharmacoresistant epilepsy: practical experience at a Turkish tertiary referral center.Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2010 Jul;14(4):334-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2009.09.010. Epub 2009 Oct 21. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2010. PMID: 19850501
-
Vagus nerve stimulation for refractory epilepsy in children: More to VNS than seizure frequency reduction.Epilepsia. 2009 May;50(5):1220-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2008.01940.x. Epub 2009 Dec 15. Epilepsia. 2009. PMID: 19170732 Clinical Trial.
-
Clinical course of young patients with Dravet syndrome after vagal nerve stimulation.Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2011 Jan;15(1):8-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2010.09.003. Epub 2010 Oct 23. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2011. PMID: 20971664 Review.
-
Treatment of refractory epilepsy in adult patients with right-sided vagus nerve stimulation.Epilepsy Res. 2010 Jun;90(1-2):1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2010.04.007. Epub 2010 May 21. Epilepsy Res. 2010. PMID: 20488666 Review.
Cited by
-
Surgically implanted and non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation: a review of efficacy, safety and tolerability.Eur J Neurol. 2015 Sep;22(9):1260-8. doi: 10.1111/ene.12629. Epub 2015 Jan 23. Eur J Neurol. 2015. PMID: 25614179 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Pharmacotherapeutic and Non-Pharmacological Options for Refractory and Difficult-to-Treat Seizures.J Cent Nerv Syst Dis. 2012 Jun 19;4:105-15. doi: 10.4137/JCNSD.S8315. Print 2012. J Cent Nerv Syst Dis. 2012. PMID: 23650471 Free PMC article.
-
A Review of Parameter Settings for Invasive and Non-invasive Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) Applied in Neurological and Psychiatric Disorders.Front Neurosci. 2021 Jul 13;15:709436. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.709436. eCollection 2021. Front Neurosci. 2021. PMID: 34326720 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Transdermal auricular vagus stimulation for the treatment of postural tachycardia syndrome.Auton Neurosci. 2021 Dec;236:102886. doi: 10.1016/j.autneu.2021.102886. Epub 2021 Sep 29. Auton Neurosci. 2021. PMID: 34634682 Free PMC article.
-
Overcoming failure: improving acceptance and success of implanted neural interfaces.Bioelectron Med. 2025 Mar 14;11(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s42234-025-00168-7. Bioelectron Med. 2025. PMID: 40083033 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical