[Anti-arrhythmia therapy in emergencies--lidocaine versus ajmaline]
- PMID: 2058217
[Anti-arrhythmia therapy in emergencies--lidocaine versus ajmaline]
Abstract
Up to now lidocain was regarded as remedy of first choice in life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias. According to more recent investigations in the emergency situation ajmalin showed itself superior to lidocain in the treatment of ventricular tachycardias. For the prophylaxis of primary ventricular fibrillation lidocain is still recommended, though despite numerous studies an effectiveness is not verified. The treatment of the primary ventricular fibrillation should always be performed by defibrillation as far as possible. The earlier it is performed the more successful is the measure. If a defibrillator is not at disposal an attempt with lidocain or ajmalin can bie made.
Similar articles
-
[New aspects of the clinical use of anti-arrhythmia agents with special reference to acute therapy of ventricular tachycardia (lidocaine vs. ajmaline)].Herz. 1990 Apr;15(2):79-89. Herz. 1990. PMID: 2188894 Review. German.
-
[Emergency therapy of ventricular tachycardias: lidocaine versus ajmaline].Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1988 Aug 26;113(34):1317-21. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1067813. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1988. PMID: 3044723 Clinical Trial. German.
-
[Arrhythmias during pregnancy].Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2008 Sep;133(36):1799-804. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1082814. Epub 2008 Sep 2. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2008. PMID: 18767007 Review. German.
-
Lidocaine as an antiarrhythmic Experience in 68 patients.Acta Med Scand. 1969 Apr;185(4):297-302. Acta Med Scand. 1969. PMID: 4185142 No abstract available.
-
[Ineffective use of lidocaine in preventing reperfusion arrhythmias in patients with acute myocardial infarct].Z Kardiol. 1985 Mar;74(3):185-90. Z Kardiol. 1985. PMID: 3158128 Clinical Trial. German.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Research Materials