Safety of small-for-size grafts in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation using the right lobe
- PMID: 20583075
- DOI: 10.1002/lt.22094
Safety of small-for-size grafts in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation using the right lobe
Abstract
The problem of graft size is one of the critical factors limiting the expansion of adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). We compared the outcome of LDLT recipients who received grafts with a graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GRWR) < 0.8% or a GRWR > or = 0.8%, and we analyzed the risk factors affecting graft survival after small-for-size grafts (SFSGs) were used. Between June 1997 and April 2008, 427 patients underwent LDLT with right lobe grafts at the Department of Surgery of Samsung Medical Center. Recipients were divided into 2 groups: group A with a GRWR < 0.8% (n = 35) and group B with a GRWR > or = 0.8% (n = 392). We retrospectively evaluated the recipient factors, donor factors, and operative factors through the medical records. Small-for-size dysfunction (SFSD) occurred in 2 of 35 patients (5.7%) in group A and in 14 of 392 patients (3.6%) in group B (P = 0.368). Graft survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were not different between the 2 groups (87.8%, 83.4%, and 74.1% versus 90.7%, 84.5%, and 79.4%, P = 0.852). However, when we analyzed risk factors within group A, donor age and middle hepatic vein tributary drainage were significant risk factors for graft survival according to univariate analysis (P = 0.042 and P = 0.038, respectively). Donor age was the only significant risk factor for poor graft survival according to multivariate analysis. The graft survival rates of recipients without SFSD tended to be higher than those of recipients with SFSD (85.3% versus 50.0%, P = 0.074). The graft survival rates of recipients with grafts from donors < 44 years old were significantly higher than those of recipients with grafts from donors > or = 44 years old (92.2% versus 53.6%, P = 0.005). In conclusion, an SFSG (GRWR < 0.8%) can be used safely in adult-to-adult right lobe LDLT when a recipient is receiving the graft from a donor younger than 44 years.
Comment in
-
Small-for-size graft: not defined solely by being small for size.Liver Transpl. 2010 Jul;16(7):815-7. doi: 10.1002/lt.22113. Liver Transpl. 2010. PMID: 20583077 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
A graft to body weight ratio less than 0.8 does not exclude adult-to-adult right-lobe living donor liver transplantation.Liver Transpl. 2009 Dec;15(12):1776-82. doi: 10.1002/lt.21955. Liver Transpl. 2009. PMID: 19938139
-
Lower limit of the graft-to-recipient weight ratio can be safely reduced to 0.6% in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation in combination with portal pressure control.Transplant Proc. 2011 Jul-Aug;43(6):2391-3. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2011.05.037. Transplant Proc. 2011. PMID: 21839274
-
Critical graft size in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation: impact of the recipient's disease.Liver Transpl. 2001 Nov;7(11):948-53. doi: 10.1053/jlts.2001.29033. Liver Transpl. 2001. PMID: 11699030
-
Management of the middle hepatic vein and its tributaries in right lobe living donor liver transplantation.Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2007 Aug;6(4):358-63. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2007. PMID: 17690029 Review.
-
Impact of small-for-size liver grafts on medium-term and long-term graft survival in living donor liver transplantation: A meta-analysis.World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Sep 28;25(36):5559-5568. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i36.5559. World J Gastroenterol. 2019. PMID: 31576100 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Excellent outcome in 238 consecutive living donor liver transplantations using the right liver graft in a large volume single center.World J Surg. 2013 Jun;37(6):1419-29. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-1976-y. World J Surg. 2013. PMID: 23467924
-
Successful living donor liver transplantation with a graft-to-recipient weight ratio of 0.41 without portal flow modulation: A case report.World J Clin Cases. 2022 Jun 6;10(16):5414-5419. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i16.5414. World J Clin Cases. 2022. PMID: 35812653 Free PMC article.
-
Small for size syndrome difficult dilemma: Lessons from 10 years single centre experience in living donor liver transplantation.World J Hepatol. 2017 Jul 28;9(21):930-944. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v9.i21.930. World J Hepatol. 2017. PMID: 28824744 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of Graft Size Matching on the Early Post-Transplant Complications and Patients Survival in Children after Living Donor Liver Transplantations.Children (Basel). 2021 Jul 6;8(7):579. doi: 10.3390/children8070579. Children (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34356558 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical Practice Guidelines for Liver Transplantation in Saudi Arabia.Saudi Med J. 2021 Sep;42(9):927-968. doi: 10.15537/smj.2021.42.9.20210126. Saudi Med J. 2021. PMID: 34470833 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous