Definitive embolization of meningiomas. A review
- PMID: 20584499
- PMCID: PMC3399720
- DOI: 10.1177/159101990501100210
Definitive embolization of meningiomas. A review
Abstract
This review examines the possible role for definitive embolization as a primary therapy for intracranial meningiomas. Surgery or radiosurgery are currently considered the standard of care for most benign meningiomas. However, each of these carries substantial risks. The perioperative mortality for surgical resection, as reported in large series, is between 3.7-9.4%; these studies report a similarly high rate of new neurological deficits following surgery. The rate of complications from radiosurgery is reported between 2-16% and it may take months to years before improvement in symptoms occurs following this therapy. There are a few reports of treating meningiomas by embolization without subsequent surgery. While these studies include small numbers of patients and have limited follow-up, the initial results are very promising. Given the risks and limitations of surgery and radiosurgery, prospective trials are now needed to determine the safety and efficacy of definitive embolization.
Figures
References
-
- Louis DN SB, Budka H, et al. Meningiomas. In: Kleihues P CW, editor. Pathology and genetics of tumours of the nervous system: World Health Organisation classification of tumours. Lyon: IARC Press; 2000. pp. 176–184.
-
- Radhakrishnan K, Mokri B, et al. The trends in incidence of primary brain tumors in the population of Rochester, Minnesota. Annals of Neurology. 1995;37:67–73. - PubMed
-
- Chamberlain M. Intracerebral Meningiomas. Current Treatment Options in Neurology. 2004;6:297–305. - PubMed
-
- Whittle IR, Smith C, et al. Meningiomas. [see comment] Lancet. 2004;363:1535–1543. - PubMed
-
- Braunstein JB, Vick NA. Meningiomas: the decision not to operate. Neurology. 1997;48:1459–1462. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
