Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009:2009:625376.
doi: 10.1155/2009/625376. Epub 2010 Feb 10.

Cutaneous scarring: a clinical review

Richard Baker  1 , Fulvio Urso-Baiarda, Claire Linge, Adriaan Grobbelaar
Affiliations

Cutaneous scarring: a clinical review

Richard Baker et al. Dermatol Res Pract. 2009.

Abstract

Cutaneous scarring can cause patients symptoms ranging from the psychological to physical pain. Although the process of normal scarring is well described the ultimate cause of pathological scarring remains unknown. Similarly, exactly how early gestation fetuses can heal scarlessly remains unsolved. These questions are crucial in the search for a preventative or curative antiscarring agent. Such a discovery would be of enormous medical and commercial importance, not least because it may have application in other tissues. In the clinical context the assessment of scars is becoming more sophisticated and new physical, medical and surgical therapies are being introduced. This review aims to summarise some of the recent developments in scarring research for non-specialists and specialists alike.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The lines of Langer or relaxed skin tension lines.
Figure 2
Figure 2
A human myofibroblast, ×40 magnification. The nucleus is stained orange with propidium iodide and the filaments of α-smooth muscle actin are immunostained green.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The global scar comparison scale. The photographic records of each scar are placed side by side over a double-ended visual analogue scale which represents percentage scar improvement. The 0% rating equates to an assessors opinion that there is no detectible difference between the two scars; whereas the 100% rating on either side means that that particular scar is so improved that it is imperceptible from the surrounding normal skin.
Figure 4
Figure 4
A hypertrophic postsurgical scar.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Presternal keloid scar.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Dunkin CSJ, Pleat JM, Gillespie PH, Tyler MPH, Roberts AHN, McGrouther DA. Scarring occurs at a critical depth of skin injury: precise measurement in a graduated dermal scratch in human volunteers. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2007;119(6):1722–1732. - PubMed
    1. http://www.scarinfo.org/whatisascar.html.
    1. Mustoe TA, Cooter RD, Gold MH, et al. International clinical recommendations on scar management. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2002;110(2):560–571. - PubMed
    1. Masters M, McMahon M, Svens B. Reliability testing of a new scar assessment tool, matching assessment of scars and photographs (MAPS) Journal of Burn Care and Rehabilitation. 2005;26(3):273–284. - PubMed
    1. Baker RHJ, Townley WA, Mckeon S, Linge C, Vijh V. Retrospective study of the association between hypertrophic burn scarring and bacterial colonization. Journal of Burn Care and Research. 2007;28(1):152–156. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources