Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010:2010:649731.
doi: 10.1155/2010/649731. Epub 2010 Mar 18.

Desmosomal component expression in normal, dysplastic, and oral squamous cell carcinoma

Affiliations

Desmosomal component expression in normal, dysplastic, and oral squamous cell carcinoma

Nagamani Narayana et al. Dermatol Res Pract. 2010.

Abstract

Squamous cell carcinoma (oral SCC) is the most common oral cancer in the U.S., affecting nearly 30,000 Americans each year. Despite recent advances in detection and treatment, there has been little improvement in the five-year survival rate for this devastating disease. Oral cancer may be preceded by premalignant disease that appears histologically as dysplasia. Identification of molecular markers for cellular change would assist in determining the risk of dysplasia progressing to oral squamous cell carcinoma. The goal of this study was to determine if any correlation exists between histological diagnosed dysplasia and OSCC lesions and altered expression of desmosomal cell-cell adhesion molecules in the oral epithelium. Our data showed that oral SCC tissue samples showed decreased immunoreactivity of both desmoplakin and plakophilin-1 proteins compared to normal oral epithelium. Furthermore, significant decrease in desmoplakin immunoreactivity was observed in dysplastic tissue compared to normal oral epithelium. In contrast, the level of desmoglein-1 staining was unchanged between samples however desmoglein-1 was found localized to cell borders in oral SCC samples. These data suggest that changes in expression of desmoplakin and plakophilin-1 may prove to be a useful marker for changes in tissue morphology and provide a tool for identifying pre-neoplastic lesions of the oral cavity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Morphologic evaluation of normal oral mucosa (a), dysplastic oral mucosa (b), and oral squamous cell carcinoma (c). Representative sections were stained with Hematoxylin and eosin to verify the initial diagnosis of the tissue blocks used in the present study.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Representative antidesmoplakin staining of oral tissues. Antidesmoplakin monoclonal antibody (10F6) was used to stain normal oral mucosa (a), dysplastic oral mucosa (b), and oral squamous cell carcinoma (c). Normal oral mucosa processed in the absence of primary antibody serves as a negative control (d). The scale bar in panel A corresponds to 20 μm.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Representative antiplakophilin-1 staining of oral tissues. Antiplakophilin-1 monoclonal antibody (14B11) was used to stain normal oral mucosa (a), dysplastic oral mucosa (b), and oral squamous cell carcinoma (c). Normal oral mucosa processed in the absence of primary antibody serves as a negative control (d). The scale bar in panel A corresponds to 20 μm.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Representative anti-desmoglein-1 staining of oral tissues. Anti-desmoglein-1 monoclonal antibody (27B2) was used to stain normal oral mucosa (a), dysplastic oral mucosa (b), and oral squamous cell carcinoma (c). Normal oral mucosa processed in the absence of primary antibody serves as a negative control (d). The scale bar in panel A corresponds to 10 μm.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Semiquantitative scoring of desmosomal component expression. Relative intensity of desmoplakin, plakophilin-1, and desmoglein-1 was scored by three observers and the average score is presented (+ or − the standard error) for normal oral mucosa (N), dysplastic epithelium (D), and oral squamous cell carcinoma (S) (* :  z value >2.394 indicate significant difference).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Murray T, Xu J, Thun MJ. Cancer statistics, 2007. CA: Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2007;57(1):43–66. - PubMed
    1. Cohen EEW, Baru J, Huo D, et al. Efficacy and safety of treating T4 oral cavity tumors with primary chemoradiotherapy. Head and Neck. 2009;31(8):1013–1021. - PubMed
    1. Rosenthal DI, Mendoza TR, Chambers MS, et al. Measuring head and neck cancer symptom burden: the development and validation of the M. D. Anderson symptom inventory, head and neck module. Head and Neck. 2007;29(10):923–931. - PubMed
    1. Warnakulasuriya S, Reibel J, Bouquot J, Dabelsteen E. Oral epithelial dysplasia classification systems: predictive value, utility, weaknesses and scope for improvement. Journal of Oral Pathology and Medicine. 2008;37(3):127–133. - PubMed
    1. Hiraki A, Shinohara M, Ikebe T, Nakamura S, Kurahara S, Garrod DR. Immunohistochemical staining of desmosomal components in oral squamous cell carcinomas and its association with tumour behaviour. British Journal of Cancer. 1996;73(12):1491–1497. - PMC - PubMed