Relationship of intraluminal pH and pressure within the lower esophageal sphincter
- PMID: 2058619
Relationship of intraluminal pH and pressure within the lower esophageal sphincter
Abstract
To determine the relationship between lower esophageal sphincter (LES) intraluminal pressure and its intraluminal pH, we studied six healthy volunteers. We recorded intraluminal pressure and pH concurrently using rapid pull-through, slow pull-through, and station pull-through, as well as, rapid push-through and slow push-through techniques. The results showed that LES length was 35 +/- 4 (SE) mm by RPT and 30 +/- 3 mm by SPT. The pressure was maximal in the proximal half of the LES. On rapid pull-throughs, the intraluminal pH rose from about 1.5 to reach a value of about 2.5 at the peak of the high pressure zone. With continued withdrawal into the esophageal body, the recorded pH rose minimally to about 3-4. On push-throughs, the pH recorded along the LES was the same as that of the esophageal body. After the electrode cleared the LES, the pH abruptly fell to gastric pH. During station pull-through with the electrode 0.5-1.5 cm proximal to the distal LES margin, transient pH drops were observed with swallows. With rapid swallows, however, the pH drop did not occur until after the last swallow. This finding suggests that the pH drops with swallows were due to axial LES movement rather than gastroesophageal acid reflux. We conclude that 1) the relationship of the gastroesophageal pH transition zone and LES high pressure zone is better defined by a sphincter push-through than a pull-through; 2) the transition between gastric and esophageal pH occurs either at or slightly distal to the distal LES margin; and 3) swallow-induced axial LES movement may cause spurious recording of acid reflux when the pH probe is positioned within the distal half of the LES.
Similar articles
-
Dual site ambulatory pH monitoring: a probe across the lower esophageal sphincter does not induce gastroesophageal reflux.Am J Gastroenterol. 1996 Jun;91(6):1162-6. Am J Gastroenterol. 1996. PMID: 8651164 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of lower esophageal sphincter manometrics and gastroesophageal reflux measured by 24-hour pH recording.Am J Gastroenterol. 1990 Jun;85(6):692-6. Am J Gastroenterol. 1990. PMID: 2353688
-
Patterns of esophageal inhibition during swallowing, pharyngeal stimulation, and transient LES relaxation. Lower esophageal sphincter.Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2003 Feb;284(2):G242-7. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00301.2002. Epub 2002 Oct 16. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2003. PMID: 12388187 Clinical Trial.
-
Pathophysiology of gastroesophageal reflux. Lower esophageal sphincter dysfunction in gastroesophageal reflux disease.Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 1990 Sep;19(3):517-35. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 1990. PMID: 2228162 Review.
-
Physiology of the LES.Dis Esophagus. 2012 May;25(4):286-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2011.01184.x. Epub 2011 Mar 8. Dis Esophagus. 2012. PMID: 21385287 Review.
Cited by
-
The mouth or the nose: the past, present, and future of ultra-slim gastroscopy of the upper gastrointestinal tract in pediatrics.Front Pediatr. 2025 Jul 22;13:1630157. doi: 10.3389/fped.2025.1630157. eCollection 2025. Front Pediatr. 2025. PMID: 40766914 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Interrogation of esophagogastric junction barrier function using the esophagogastric junction contractile integral: an observational cohort study.Dis Esophagus. 2016 Oct;29(7):820-828. doi: 10.1111/dote.12389. Epub 2015 Jul 14. Dis Esophagus. 2016. PMID: 26173375 Free PMC article.
-
Esophagogastric junction contractile integral (EGJ-CI) quantifies changes in EGJ barrier function with surgical intervention.Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2016 May;28(5):639-46. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12757. Epub 2016 Jan 14. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2016. PMID: 26768087 Free PMC article.