Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 May;49(3):312-5.

Evaluation of a commercial colorimetric fecal dipstick assay for the detection of Helicobacter hepaticus infections in laboratory mice

Affiliations

Evaluation of a commercial colorimetric fecal dipstick assay for the detection of Helicobacter hepaticus infections in laboratory mice

Julie E Freebersyser et al. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2010 May.

Abstract

Mice used in biomedical research typically are tested for the presence of Helicobacter spp., including Helicobacter hepaticus. Here we evaluated the ability of a commercially available colorimetric Helicobacter dipstick assay to detect H. hepaticus in experimentally and naturally infected mice, with use of a Helicobacter PCR assay as the 'gold standard' test. None of the fecal samples from experimentally infected A/JCr mice (n = 12) tested positive for Helicobacter by the colorimetric dipstick test. In naturally infected A/JCr and C57BL/6 mice, 11% (1 of 9) and 30% (3 of 10) of fecal samples, respectively, tested positive for Helicobacter by the colorimetric dipstick assay. In these 3 groups of H. hepaticus-infected mice, statistically fewer mice tested positive by the colorimetric dipstick test than by PCR. The colorimetric Helicobacter dipstick assay had an overall diagnostic sensitivity of 13%, diagnostic specificity of 94%, and analytical sensitivity of 10(8) H. hepaticus cfu/mL. As currently formulated, the colorimetric dipstick assay had high specificity but lacked sensitivity for detecting H. hepaticus infections in 2 strains of mice commonly used in research, thereby limiting its utility as a diagnostic screening test for H. hepaticus infections in research mice.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Percentages of fecal samples from A/JCr mice (A/J; n = 12) experimentally inoculated with H. hepaticus and A/JCr mice (n = 9) and C57BL/6 mice (B6; n = 10) naturally infected with H. hepaticus that tested positive for Helicobacter spp. by a colorimetric dipstick assay or a Helicobacter PCR assay. The same fecal sample from individual mice was tested by using both assays. The number of samples testing positive or negative was used for statistical analysis. *, P < 0.01 compared with mice of the same strain and method of infection.

Similar articles

References

    1. Beckwith CS, Franklin CL, Reuel RH, Besh-Williford CL, Riley LK. 1997. Fecal PCR assay for the diagnosis of Helicobacter infection in laboratory rodents. J Clin Microbiol 35:1620–1623 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Feng S, Ku K, Hodzic E, Lorenzana E, Freet K, Barthold SW. 2005. Differential detection of 5 mouse-infecting Helicobacter species by multiplex PCR. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 12:531–536 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Institute for Laboratory Animal Research 1996. Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals. Washington (DC): National Academies Press - PubMed
    1. Livingston RS, Riley LK. 2003. Diagnostic testing of mouse and rat colonies for infectious agents. Lab Anim (NY) 32:44–51 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Myles MH, Dieckgraefe BK, Criley JM, Franklin CL. 2007. Characterization of cecal gene expression in a differentially susceptible mouse model of bacterial-induced inflammatory bowl disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 13:822–836 - PubMed

Publication types