Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jul;29(7):1103-15.
doi: 10.7863/jum.2010.29.7.1103.

Should bilateral uterine artery notching be used in the risk assessment for preeclampsia, small-for-gestational-age, and gestational hypertension?

Affiliations

Should bilateral uterine artery notching be used in the risk assessment for preeclampsia, small-for-gestational-age, and gestational hypertension?

Jimmy Espinoza et al. J Ultrasound Med. 2010 Jul.

Erratum in

  • J Ultrasound Med. 2010 Oct;29(10):1494

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the value of bilateral uterine artery notching in the second trimester in the risk assessment for preeclampsia, gestational hypertension, and small-for-gestational-age (SGA) without preeclampsia.

Methods: This prospective cohort study included 4190 singleton pregnancies that underwent ultrasound examination between 23 and 25 weeks' gestation. The 95th percentiles of the mean pulsatility index (PI) and resistive index (RI) of both uterine arteries were calculated. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to determine if bilateral uterine artery notching is an independent explanatory variable for the occurrence of preeclampsia, early-onset preeclampsia (<or=34 weeks), late-onset preeclampsia (>34 weeks), gestational hypertension, and delivery of an SGA neonate without preeclampsia, while controlling for confounding factors.

Results: (1) The prevalence of preeclampsia, early-onset preeclampsia, late-onset preeclampsia, SGA, and gestational hypertension were 3.4%, 0.5%, 2.9%, 10%, and 7.9%, respectively; (2) 7.2% of the study population had bilateral uterine artery notching; and (3) bilateral uterine artery notching was an independent explanatory variable for the development of preeclampsia (odds ratio [OR], 2.1; 95% confidence interval [CI],1.28-3.36), early-onset preeclampsia (OR, 4.47; 95% CI, 1.50-13.35), and gestational hypertension (OR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.02-2.26), but not for late-onset preeclampsia or SGA.

Conclusions: Bilateral uterine notching between 23 and 25 weeks' gestation is an independent risk factor for the development of early-onset preeclampsia and gestational hypertension. Thus, bilateral uterine artery notching should be considered in the assessment of risk for the development of these pregnancy complications.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Comparison of areas under the curve (AUC) of Doppler parameters in the prediction of preeclampsia
The presence of a bilateral uterine artery notching and/or a mean uterine artery PI>95% percentile had the highest auc (0.619) for the prediction of preeclampsia. However, the auc of the combination of these Doppler parameters was significantly higher than that of bilateral notching alone (auc: 0.578; p=0.02) but not significantly higher than the combination of bilateral uterine artery notching and/or a mean uterine artery RI>95% percentile (auc: 0.612; p=0.53), or a mean uterine artery PI or RI >95% (auc: 0.577, p=0.05 and auc: 0.570, p=0.05; respectively).
Figure 2
Figure 2. Comparison of areas under the curve (auc) of Doppler parameters in the prediction of early-onset preeclampsia
The presence of bilateral uterine artery notching and/or a mean uterine artery PI or RI>95% percentile had the highest auc (0.821) for the prediction of early-onset preeclampsia. However, the auc of the combination of these Doppler parameters was not significantly higher than that of bilateral notching alone (AUC: 0.73; p=0.07) or that of a mean uterine artery PI or RI >95% (auc: 0.767, p=0.65 for both comparisons).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Harrington KF, Campbell S, Bewley S, Bower S. Doppler velocimetry studies of the uterine artery in the early prediction of pre-eclampsia and intra-uterine growth retardation. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1991;42(Suppl):S14–S20. - PubMed
    1. Bower S, Bewley S, Campbell S. Improved prediction of preeclampsia by two-stage screening of uterine arteries using the early diastolic notch and color Doppler imaging. Obstet Gynecol. 1993;82:78–83. - PubMed
    1. Harrington K, Cooper D, Lees C, Hecher K, Campbell S. Doppler ultrasound of the uterine arteries: the importance of bilateral notching in the prediction of pre-eclampsia, placental abruption or delivery of a small-for-gestational-age baby. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1996;7:182–188. - PubMed
    1. Irion O, Masse J, Forest JC, Moutquin JM. Prediction of pre-eclampsia, low birthweight for gestation and prematurity by uterine artery blood flow velocity waveforms analysis in low risk nulliparous women. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998;105:422–429. - PubMed
    1. Aardema MW, De Wolf BT, Saro MC, et al. Quantification of the diastolic notch in Doppler ultrasound screening of uterine arteries. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2000;16:630–634. - PubMed

Publication types