Exploring facilitators and barriers to individual and organizational level capacity building: outcomes of participation in a community priority setting workshop
- PMID: 20587629
- DOI: 10.1177/1757975910365225
Exploring facilitators and barriers to individual and organizational level capacity building: outcomes of participation in a community priority setting workshop
Abstract
This article explores facilitators and barriers to individual and organizational capacity to address priority strategies for community-level chronic disease prevention. Interviews were conducted with a group of participants who previously participated in a community priority-setting workshop held in two Alberta communities. The goal of the workshop was to bring together key community stakeholders to collaboratively identify action strategies for preventing chronic diseases in their communities. While capacity building was not the specific aim of the workshop, it could be considered an unintended byproduct of bringing together community representatives around a specific issue. One purpose of this study was to examine the participants' capacity to take action on the priority strategies identified at the workshop. Eleven one-on-one semi-structured interviews were conducted with workshop participants to examine facilitators and barriers to individual and organizational level capacity building. Findings suggest that there were several barriers identified by participants that limited their capacity to take action on the workshop strategies, specifically: (i) organizations' lack of priorities or competing priorities; (ii) priorities secondary to the organizational mandate; (iii) disconnect between organizational and community priorities; (iv) disconnect between community organization priorities; (v) disconnect between organizations and government/funder priorities; (vi) limited resources (i.e. time, money and personnel); and, (vii) bigger community issues. The primary facilitator of individual capacity to take action or priority strategies was supportive organizations. Recognition of these elements will allow practitioners, organizations, governments/funders, and communities to focus on seeking ways to improve capacity for chronic disease prevention.
Similar articles
-
Mechanisms for understanding the facilitators and barriers to capacity building for chronic disease prevention activities: an illustration.Health Promot Pract. 2011 Nov;12(6):858-66. doi: 10.1177/1524839910366424. Epub 2010 Aug 20. Health Promot Pract. 2011. PMID: 20729343
-
Building health promotion capacity in a primary health care workforce in the Northern Territory: some lessons from practice.Health Promot J Austr. 2013 Dec;24(3):163-9. doi: 10.1071/HE13082. Health Promot J Austr. 2013. PMID: 24355336
-
Organizational capacity for community development in regional health authorities: a conceptual model.Health Promot Int. 2004 Sep;19(3):289-98. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dah303. Health Promot Int. 2004. PMID: 15306613
-
Reciprocal capacity building for collaborative disability research between disabled people's organizations, communities and higher education institutions.Scand J Occup Ther. 2011 Dec;18(4):254-64. doi: 10.3109/11038128.2010.525748. Epub 2010 Nov 14. Scand J Occup Ther. 2011. PMID: 21073368 Review.
-
Reducing obesity and related chronic disease risk in children and youth: a synthesis of evidence with 'best practice' recommendations.Obes Rev. 2006 Feb;7 Suppl 1:7-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2006.00242.x. Obes Rev. 2006. PMID: 16371076 Review.
Cited by
-
Building capacity for dementia care in Latin America and the Caribbean.Dement Neuropsychol. 2014 Dec 1;8(4):310-316. doi: 10.1590/s1980-57642014dn84000002. Dement Neuropsychol. 2014. PMID: 25932285 Free PMC article.
-
Priority-setting for evidence-based health outreach in community-based organizations: A mixed-methods study in three Massachusetts communities.Transl Behav Med. 2013 Jun 1;3(2):180-188. doi: 10.1007/s13142-012-0191-y. Transl Behav Med. 2013. PMID: 23795220 Free PMC article.
-
Patient and public engagement in priority setting: A systematic rapid review of the literature.PLoS One. 2018 Mar 2;13(3):e0193579. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193579. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 29499043 Free PMC article.
-
The top research questions asked by people with lived depression experience in Alberta: a survey.CMAJ Open. 2018 Sep 28;6(3):E398-E405. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20180034. Print 2018 Jul-Sep. CMAJ Open. 2018. PMID: 30266777 Free PMC article.
-
People with lived experience (PWLE) of depression: describing and reflecting on an explicit patient engagement process within depression research priority setting in Alberta, Canada.Res Involv Engagem. 2018 Oct 16;4:37. doi: 10.1186/s40900-018-0115-1. eCollection 2018. Res Involv Engagem. 2018. PMID: 30349739 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources