Interventions with adherence-promoting components in pediatric type 1 diabetes: meta-analysis of their impact on glycemic control
- PMID: 20587726
- PMCID: PMC2890378
- DOI: 10.2337/dc09-2268
Interventions with adherence-promoting components in pediatric type 1 diabetes: meta-analysis of their impact on glycemic control
Abstract
Objective: To review interventions with adherence-promoting components and document their impact on glycemic control via meta-analysis.
Research design and methods: Data from 15 studies that met the following criteria were subjected to meta-analysis: 1) randomized, controlled trial, 2) study sample included youth aged <19 years, 3) youth had type 1 diabetes, 4) study reported results on glycemic control; and 5) study reported use of adherence- or self-management-promoting components.
Results: The 15 studies included 997 youth with type 1 diabetes. The mean effect size for pre- to posttreatment change for the intervention versus control group comparison was 0.11 (95% CI -0.01 to 0.23). This is a small effect, demonstrating very modest improvements in glycemic control. However, analysis for the pre- to posttreatment effects for the intervention group alone did show significant variability [Q(14) = 33.11; P < 0.05]. Multicomponent interventions, those that targeted emotional, social, or family processes that facilitate diabetes management, were more potent than interventions just targeting a direct, behavioral process (e.g., increase in blood glucose monitoring frequency).
Conclusions: Interventions that focus on direct, behavioral processes and neglect emotional, social, and family processes are unlikely to have an impact on glycemic control; multicomponent interventions showed more robust effects on A1C. Future clinical research should focus on refining interventions and gathering more efficacy and effectiveness data on health outcomes of the pediatric patients treated with these interventions.
Figures
Similar articles
-
A multicomponent motivational intervention to improve adherence among adolescents with poorly controlled type 1 diabetes: a pilot study.J Pediatr Psychol. 2013 Jul;38(6):629-37. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jst032. Epub 2013 May 22. J Pediatr Psychol. 2013. PMID: 23699750 Free PMC article.
-
Engagement with a Text-Messaging Intervention Improves Adherence in Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes: Brief Report.Diabetes Technol Ther. 2018 May;20(5):386-389. doi: 10.1089/dia.2018.0015. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2018. PMID: 29792749 Free PMC article.
-
Barriers to glycemic control in youth with type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes.Pediatr Diabetes. 2011 May;12(3 Pt 1):197-205. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5448.2010.00667.x. Pediatr Diabetes. 2011. PMID: 20561243 Review. No abstract available.
-
Hope and mealtime insulin boluses are associated with depressive symptoms and glycemic control in youth with type 1 diabetes mellitus.Pediatr Diabetes. 2018 Nov;19(7):1309-1314. doi: 10.1111/pedi.12695. Epub 2018 Jun 5. Pediatr Diabetes. 2018. PMID: 29797445 Free PMC article.
-
Adherence to insulin treatment in diabetes: can it be improved?J Diabetes. 2015 May;7(3):315-21. doi: 10.1111/1753-0407.12212. Epub 2014 Nov 10. J Diabetes. 2015. PMID: 25195971 Review.
Cited by
-
Adherence to Insulin Therapy.Diabetes Spectr. 2016 Aug;29(3):166-70. doi: 10.2337/diaspect.29.3.166. Diabetes Spectr. 2016. PMID: 27574371 Free PMC article.
-
Health-system-based interventions to improve care in pediatric and adolescent type 1 diabetes.Curr Diab Rep. 2015 Nov;15(11):91. doi: 10.1007/s11892-015-0664-8. Curr Diab Rep. 2015. PMID: 26374568 Review.
-
Use of Relational Agents to Improve Family Communication in Type 1 Diabetes: Methods.JMIR Res Protoc. 2016 Jul 28;5(3):e151. doi: 10.2196/resprot.5817. JMIR Res Protoc. 2016. PMID: 27468762 Free PMC article.
-
Applying the use of shared medical appointments (SMAs) to improve continuous glucose monitor (CGM) use, glycemic control, and quality of life in marginalized youth with type 1 diabetes: Study protocol for a pilot prospective cohort study.Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2023 Jan 16;32:101067. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2023.101067. eCollection 2023 Apr. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2023. PMID: 36698741 Free PMC article.
-
The potential for motivational interviewing to improve outcomes in the management of diabetes and obesity in paediatric and adult populations: a clinical review.Diabetes Obes Metab. 2014 May;16(5):381-7. doi: 10.1111/dom.12195. Epub 2013 Sep 1. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2014. PMID: 23927612 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Hood KK, Peterson CM, Rohan JM, Drotar D: Association between adherence and glycemic control in pediatric type 1 diabetes: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics 2009; 124: e1171–e1179 - PubMed
-
- Johnson SB, Kelly M, Henretta JC, Cunningham WR, Tomer A, Silverstein JH: A longitudinal analysis of adherence and health status in childhood diabetes. J Pediatr Psychol 1992; 17: 537–553 - PubMed
-
- Silverstein JH, Klingensmith G, Copeland K, Plotnick L, Kaufman F, Laffel L, Deeb L, Grey M, Anderson B, Holzmeister LA, Clark N: Care of children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: a statement of the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care 2005; 28: 186–212 - PubMed
-
- Effect of intensive diabetes treatment on the development and progression of long-term complications in adolescents with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. J Pediatr 1994; 125: 177–188 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous