Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jul-Aug;51(4):320-9.
doi: 10.1176/appi.psy.51.4.320.

Impact of delirium on decision-making capacity after hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation

Affiliations

Impact of delirium on decision-making capacity after hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation

Thomas Zaubler et al. Psychosomatics. 2010 Jul-Aug.

Abstract

Background: Delirium is a common complication of myeloablative hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT), yet no studies have explored the later effects of an episode of delirium in this setting on patients' decision-making capacity after the acute symptoms of delirium have resolved.

Objective: The authors assessed the impact of delirium during the acute phase of myeloablative HSCT on later decision-making capacity.

Method: Decision-making capacity was assessed with the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool in 19 patients before they received their first HSCT and at 30 and 80 days post-transplantation. Delirium was assessed 3 times per week with the Delirium Rating Scale and the Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale from 7 days pre-transplantation through 30 days post-transplantation.

Results: Although there was little variance in the pre-treatment scores, with most patients showing very high or perfect scores on decision-making abilities, a multivariate regression model showed that delirium was predictive of a lower reasoning score at Day 30 post-transplantation.

Conclusion: Patients who experienced a delirium episode during the acute phase of HSCT were not likely to develop clinically meaningful impairments in decision-making capacity post-transplantation, although they evidenced minor impairment in their reasoning ability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Appelbaum P, Lidz C, Meisel A: Informed Consent: Legal Theory and Clinical Practice. New York, Oxford Univ. Press, 1987
    1. Grisso T, Appelbaum PS: The MacArthur Treatment Competence Study, III: abilities of patients to consent to psychiatric and medical treatments. Law Hum Behav 1995; 19:149–174 - PubMed
    1. Peper M, Steinvorth S, Schraube P, et al.: Neurobehavioral tox icity of total body irradiation: a follow-up in long-term survivors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2000; 46:303–311 - PubMed
    1. Pless M, Zivkovic SA: Neurologic complications of transplantation. Neurologist 2002; 8:107–120 - PubMed
    1. Sostak P, Padovan CS, Yousry TA, et al.: Prospective evaluation of neurological complications after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Neurology 2003; 60:842–848 - PubMed

Publication types