Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2009 Oct;9 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S52-8.

Is health care financing in Uganda equitable?

Affiliations
Review

Is health care financing in Uganda equitable?

C M Zikusooka et al. Afr Health Sci. 2009 Oct.

Abstract

Introduction: Health care financing provides the resources and economic incentives for operating health systems and is a key determinant of health system performance. Equitable financing is based on: financial protection, progressive financing and cross-subsidies. This paper describes Uganda's health care financing landscape and documents the key equity issues associated with the current financing mechanisms.

Methods: We extensively reviewed government documents and relevant literature and conducted key informant interviews, with the aim of assessing whether Uganda's health care financing mechanisms exhibited the key principles of fair financing.

Results: Uganda's health sector remains significantly under-funded, mainly relying on private sources of financing, especially out-of-pocket spending. At 9.6 % of total government expenditure, public spending on health is far below the Abuja target of 15% that GoU committed to. Prepayments form a small proportion of funding for Uganda's health sector. There is limited cross-subsidisation and high fragmentation within and between health financing mechanisms, mainly due to high reliance on out-of-pocket payments and limited prepayment mechanisms. Without compulsory health insurance and low coverage of private health insurance, Uganda has limited pooling of resources, and hence minimal cross-subsidisation. Although tax revenue is equitable, the remaining financing mechanisms for Uganda are inequitable due to their regressive nature, their lack of financial protection and limited cross-subsidisation.

Conclusion: Overall, Uganda's current health financing is inequitable and fragmented. The government should take explicit action to promote equitable health care financing by establishing pre-payment schemes, enhancing cross-subsidisation mechanisms and through appropriate integration of financing mechanisms.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Trends in real public spending (by source) & total public spending on health 2000/1 – 2007/8 (billion, Uganda shillings at 2007/8 prices)
Source: MOH (2006), MOH(2008); Annual Health Sector Performance reports

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sustainable health financing, universal coverage and social health insurance. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2005. World Health Assembly. Resolution WHA58.33.
    1. McIntyre C, Govender V, Buregyeya E, et al. Key issues in equitable health care resource mobilisation in East and Southern Africa. Harare: EQUINET; 2008.
    1. Zikusooka C, Kyomuhangi R. Private medical prepayment and insurance schemes in Uganda: what can the proposed SHI policy learn from them? Harare: EQUINET; 2007.
    1. Ministry of health, author. Assessment of public expenditures for the health sector in Uganda: FY2003/4 – 2005/6. Government of Uganda; 2007.
    1. Ministry of Health, author. Health Sector Strategic Plan II (2005/6 – 2009/10) I. Kampala: Government of Uganda; 2004.

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources