Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2010 Apr;12(3):188-94.
doi: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2009.00143.x.

Open liver resection for colorectal metastases: better short- and long-term outcomes in patients potentially suitable for laparoscopic liver resection

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Open liver resection for colorectal metastases: better short- and long-term outcomes in patients potentially suitable for laparoscopic liver resection

Fenella K S Welsh et al. HPB (Oxford). 2010 Apr.

Abstract

Background: There is no prospective randomized data comparing laparoscopic to open hepatectomy. This study compared short- and long-term outcomes in patients undergoing hepatectomy for colorectal metastases (CRM), who were suitable for either laparoscopic or open surgery.

Methods: Data were prospectively collected from consecutive patients undergoing hepatic resection of CRM at a single centre (1987-2007). Patients who were suitable for laparoscopic resection (Group 1) were compared with patients whose tumour characteristics would best be considered for open resection (Group 2).

Results: Out of 1152 hepatectomies, 266 (23.1%) were deemed suitable for a laparoscopic approach. The median (IQR) number of metastases was greater in Group 2 [2(1-20) vs. 1(1-10), P < 0.001], as was the mean (SD) tumour size [5.3(3.6) cm vs. 3.3(1.2) cm, P < 0.001]. The median (IQR) operation time [210 (70) min vs. 240 (90) min, P < 0.001] and blood loss [270 (265) ml vs. 355 (320) ml, P < 0.001] were less in Group 1. There was no difference in length of stay, morbidity or mortality. Patients in Group 2 had a higher R1 resection rate (14.9%) compared with Group 1 (4.5%, P < 0.001) and lower 5-year survival (37.8% vs. 44.2%, P= 0.005).

Discussion: Current criteria for laparoscopic hepatectomy selects patients who have more straight-forward surgery, with less risk of an involved resection margin and better long-term survival, compared with patients unsuited to a laparoscopic approach. Clearly defined criteria for laparoscopic hepatectomy are essential to allow meaningful analysis of outcomes and the results of unrandomized series of laparoscopic hepatectomies must be interpreted with caution.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart to show derivation of study groups
Figure 2
Figure 2
Cancer-specific survival in patients undergoing hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases with a curative intent grouped according to whether these are considered suitable (Group 1) or not suitable (Group 2) for laparoscopic resection. Log-rank: chi-square = 7.873, 1 d.f., P= 0.005

Comment in

References

    1. Stangl R, Altendorf-Hofmann A, Charnley RM, Scheele J. Factors influencing the natural history of colorectal liver metastases. Lancet. 1994;343:1405–1410. - PubMed
    1. Scheele J, Stangl R, Altendorf-Hofmann A. Hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer: impact of surgical resection on the natural history. Br J Surg. 1990;77:1241–1246. - PubMed
    1. Fong Y, Fortner J, Sun RL, Brennan MF, Blumgart LH. Clinical score for predicting recurrence after hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer: analysis of 1001 consecutive cases. Ann Surg. 1999;230:309–318. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Adam R, Huguet E, Azoulay D, Castaing D, Kunstlinger F, Levi F, et al. Hepatic resection after down-staging of unresectable hepatic colorectal metastases. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2003;12:211–220. - PubMed
    1. Rees M, Tekkis PP, Welsh FKS, O’Rourke TR, John TG. Evaluation of long-term survival after hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer: a multifactorial model of 929 patients. Ann Surg. 2008;247:125–135. - PubMed

Publication types