Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2003 May 15;9(Suppl 1):51-5.
doi: 10.1177/15910199030090S106. Epub 2004 Oct 22.

Treatment Strategy for Cerebral Aneurysms Based on the Evidence of the Efficacy of GDC Embolization

Affiliations

Treatment Strategy for Cerebral Aneurysms Based on the Evidence of the Efficacy of GDC Embolization

S Miyachi et al. Interv Neuroradiol. .

Abstract

The authors reviewed 531 patients with cerebral aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils (GDCs) over 5 years to clarify both the advantages and disadvantages of embolization based on the evidence of complications by aneurysm profile. There were 52 technical complications, 25 of which resulted in unfavorable patient outcomes. Intraoperative rupture, the most serious complication exacerbating the patient's condition, occurred in 19 patients, 4 of whom expired. All of these aneurysms were very small and were mostly located in the AcomA and PICA portions. Thirteen patients encountered thromboembolic complications, 6 of whom were elderly with acute ruptured aneurysms at MCA and the tip of BA. For large or giant aneurysms manifesting the mass effect, particularly those in the ICA-C2 portion compressing the optic nerve, the saccular packing did little to ameliorate the symptoms, and subsequent surgical or endovascular trapping was needed. Therefore, saccular embolization of endovascularly difficult, very small AcomA aneurysms and large C2 aneurysm with visual symptoms should be used sparingly based on a risk-benefit assessment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. Sturaitis MK, Rinne J, et al. Impact of Guglielmi detachable coils on outcomes of patients with intracranial aneurysms treated by a multidisciplinary team at a single institution. J Neurosurg. 2000;93:569–580. - PubMed
    1. Miyachi S, Negoro M, et al. Endovascular treatment of unruptured vertebro-basilar aneurysms. Interventional Neuroradiology. 1999;5(suppl 1):83–88. - PubMed
    1. Moret J, Pierot L, et al. Endovascular treatment of anterior communicating artery aneurysms using Guglielmi detachable coils. Neuroradiology. 1996;38:800–805. - PubMed
    1. McDougall CG, Halbach VV, et al. Causes and management of aneurysmal haemorrhage occurring during embolization with Guglielmi detachable coils. J Neurosurg. 1998;89:87–92. - PubMed
    1. Sluzewski M, Bosch JA, et al. Rupture of intracranial aneurysms during treatment with Guglielmi detachable coils: incidence, outcome, and risk factors. Journal of Neurosurgery. 2001;94(2):238–240. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources