Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jun 30;2(38):38cm20.
doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3000952.

Offering individual genetic research results: context matters

Affiliations

Offering individual genetic research results: context matters

Laura M Beskow et al. Sci Transl Med. .

Abstract

The disclosure of individual genetic research results to study participants continues to be the subject of vigorous debate, centered primarily on the nature of the results. We suggest that research context, which is foreseeable when a study is designed, is a vital consideration that has not been sufficiently incorporated into the discussion. Adapting an ancillary care framework to explore what different contexts might call for with regard to offering individual genetic research results, our analysis suggests that, beyond exceptionally rare circumstances that give rise to a duty to rescue, a one-size-fits-all threshold cannot be developed for decisions about returning individual results. Instead, researchers and institutional review boards must consider the scope of entrustment involved in the research, as well as the intensity and duration of interactions with participants and the vulnerability and dependence of the study population.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Researcher Obligations to Return Individual Results
Figure 2
Figure 2
Framework for Evaluating Researcher Obligations * *Adapted from Belsky & Richardson 2004

References

    1. Kaufman D, Murphy J, Scott J, Hudson K. Subjects matter: a survey of public opinions about a large genetic cohort study. Genet Med. 2008;10:831–839. - PubMed
    1. Wendler D, Emanuel E. The debate over research on stored biological samples: what do sources think? Arch Intern Med. 2002;162:1457–1462. - PubMed
    1. Kohane IS, Taylor PL. Multi-dimensional results reporting to participants in genomic studies: Getting the right message for the right person in the right way at the right time. Science Transl Med. in press. - PubMed
    1. Beskow LM, Smolek SJ. Prospective biorepository participants' perspectives on access to research results. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2009;4:99–111. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ormond KE, Cirino AL, Helenowski IB, Chisholm RL, Wolf WA. Assessing the understanding of biobank participants. Am J Med Genet A. 2009;149A:188–198. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources