[Hygiene barriers in the hospital--psychological aspects]
- PMID: 2059279
[Hygiene barriers in the hospital--psychological aspects]
Abstract
This study was made necessary due to the great extent of hospital infections (720,000 cases) in the Federal Republic of Germany and the fact that the nosocomial infection is the most common infectious disease. Starting with a theoretical explanatory model of hygiene behaviour in clinics, 25 senior physicians, 38 assistant doctors, 31 members of the nursing staff and 20 members of the cleaning personnel and domestic staff in university clinics (surgery, orthopaedics, anaesthesia, gynaecology, paediatrics) were examined in a two-stage sociopsychological investigation. To be checked was the hypothesis that the quality and intensity of hygiene behaviour in clinics rises with the extent of personal hygiene sensitivity, knowledge about hygiene essentials, hygiene risks, causes of infection and possibilities of prophylaxis, exemplary and supervisory behaviour on the part of principals and staff in the clinic, as well as the absoluteness, succinctness, clinic-specificity and compulsoriness of rules of hygiene. General findings: (1) During training hygiene was a subject which did not arouse much interest; 57% admit big deficiencies in training; 60.4% of all those asked saw a big lack of information concerning basic knowledge of hospital hygiene, use of non-reusable materials, disinfection of endoscopes, laser probes etc., antibiotic therapy and strategy, development of resistant germs and their disinfection, ways and chains of infection, asepsis in the operating theatre, disposal of contaminated material, rules of hygiene in dealing with HIV-patients, sterilization of implants etc. (2) Doctors and nursing staff assume a relatively high incidence of hospital infections in their own clinic and in their wake an increase in psychological strain on the part of the patients, as well as higher costs in the health service. The most common hygiene deficiencies are lack of space and storage rooms, no separation of septic and aseptic patients, deficiencies in toilets and bathrooms, inadequate personal hygiene behaviour of staff, lack of protective clothing or no regular change of clothing, shortcomings in disinfection, incorrect use of syringes, stethoscopes, etc., no sterile dressings for wounds, no systematic hygiene control and no official consequences for wrong behaviour.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
Similar articles
-
[Hygienic procedures in operation theatres--guidelines and reality. Data obtained on hygiene control measures by public health service at Frankfurt am Main].Gesundheitswesen. 2003 May;65(5):312-20. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-39550. Gesundheitswesen. 2003. PMID: 12772073 German.
-
[Barriers to the enforcement of hygiene requirements in dental practice].Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg B Umwelthyg Krankenhaushyg Arbeitshyg Prav Med. 1986 Dec;183(2-3):153-78. Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg B Umwelthyg Krankenhaushyg Arbeitshyg Prav Med. 1986. PMID: 3107266 German.
-
[Personal hygiene and cleanliness in an international comparison].Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg B Umwelthyg Krankenhaushyg Arbeitshyg Prav Med. 1989 Apr;187(4-6):422-507. Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg B Umwelthyg Krankenhaushyg Arbeitshyg Prav Med. 1989. PMID: 2500808 German.
-
[Hygiene barriers in the hospital--infectious aspects].Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed. 1991 Mar;191(2-3):159-70. Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed. 1991. PMID: 2059280 Review. German.
-
[Hygiene barriers in the hospital--instrumentation aspects].Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed. 1991 Mar;191(2-3):171-81. Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed. 1991. PMID: 2059281 Review. German.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical