Distribution of Salmonella serovars in breeding, nursery, and grow-to-finish pigs, and risk factors for shedding in ten farrow-to-finish swine farms in Alberta and Saskatchewan
- PMID: 20592836
- PMCID: PMC2851729
Distribution of Salmonella serovars in breeding, nursery, and grow-to-finish pigs, and risk factors for shedding in ten farrow-to-finish swine farms in Alberta and Saskatchewan
Abstract
The study objectives were to investigate Salmonella prevalence, serovar distribution, and risk factors for shedding in 10 purposively selected farrow-to-finish farms in Saskatchewan and Alberta. Pooled fecal samples from the breeding and grow-finish phases and individual fecal samples from breeding, nursery, and grow-finish pigs were cultured for Salmonella; serotyping of isolates was performed. Pig and pen characteristics were recorded for each pig and pen sampled.Overall, 407/1143 (36%) of samples were Salmonella positive; within-farm prevalence ranged from 1% to 79%. Sows, nursery, and grow-finish pigs accounted for 43%, 29%, and 28% of positive samples, respectively. More Salmonella were detected in pooled pen than individual pig samples (P < 0.001). Among 418 Salmonella isolates, there were 19 distinct serovars; the most common were S. Derby (28.5%), S. Typhimurium, var. Copenhagen (19.1%), S. Putten (11.8%), S. Infantis (6.8%), and S. Mbandaka (6.1%). Sows were more likely to shed Salmonella than nursery or grow-finisher (OR 2.9, P < 0.001) pigs. Pelleted feed (OR 8.2, P < 0.001) and nose-to-nose pig contact through pens (OR 2.2, P = 0.005) were associated with increased Salmonella prevalence. Significant differences in serovar distribution were detected among production phases. The use of pooled pen samples is recommended as a more efficient means for accurate evaluation of Salmonella status in different phases of pig production. The breeding herd might be an important source of Salmonella persistence within farrow-to-finish farms and should be targeted in control efforts. The latter might also apply to the use of pelleted feed, which remains the most consistently reported significant risk factor for Salmonella shedding in pigs.
Les objectifs visés étaient d’étudier la prévalence de Salmonella, la distribution des sérovars, et les facteurs de risque pour l’excrétion dans 10 fermes de naisseurs-finisseurs choisies avec intention en Saskatchewan et en Alberta. Des échantillons de fèces regroupés provenant des groupes de reproducteurs et des animaux en croissance-finition ainsi que des échantillons individuels provenant des porcs reproducteurs, en pouponnière, et en croissance-finition ont été cultivés pour la recherche de Salmonella; le sérotypage des isolats a été effectué. Les caractéristiques des porcs et des enclos étaient notées pour chaque porc et enclos échantillonnés.
De manière globale, 407/1143 (36 %) des échantillons étaient positifs pour Salmonella; la prévalence intra-ferme variait entre 1 % et 79 %. De tous les échantillons positifs, 43 %, 29 % et 28 % provenaient respectivement des truies, des porcs en pouponnière et des porcs en croissance-finition. Plus de Salmonella étaient détectés dans les échantillons regroupés que dans les échantillons de porcs individuels (P < 0,001). Parmi 418 isolats de Salmonella, il y avait 19 sérovars distincts; les plus fréquents étaient S. Derby (28,5 %), S. Typhimurium var. Copenhagen (19,1 %), S. Putten (11,8), S. Infantis (6,8 %) et S. Mbandaka (6,1 %). Les truies étaient plus susceptibles d’excréter Salmonella que les porcs en pouponnière ou en croissance-finition (OR 2,9; P < 0,001). La nourriture en granule (OR 8,2; P < 0,001) et le contact nez-à-nez des animaux entre les parcs (OR 2,2; P = 0,005) étaient associés avec une augmentation de la prévalence de Salmonella. Des différences significatives dans la distribution des sérovars ont été détectées parmi les phases de production. L’utilisation des échantillons regroupés est recommandée comme étant un moyen plus efficace pour une évaluation précise du statut de contamination par Salmonella dans les différentes phases de production porcine. Le troupeau reproducteur pourrait être une source importante pour la persistance de Salmonella à l’intérieur des fermes de naisseurs-finisseurs et devrait être ciblé dans les efforts de réduction de l’infection. Ceci est également applicable à l’utilisation de nourriture en granule qui demeure le facteur de risque le plus fréquemment rapporté pour l’excrétion de Salmonella chez les porcs.
(Traduit par Docteur Serge Messier)
Similar articles
-
Antimicrobial resistance of fecal Salmonella spp. isolated from all phases of pig production in 20 herds in Alberta and Saskatchewan.Can J Vet Res. 2008;72(2):151-9. Can J Vet Res. 2008. PMID: 18505204 Free PMC article.
-
Distribution of Salmonella serovars and phage types on 80 Ontario swine farms in 2004.Can J Vet Res. 2008 Jan;72(1):1-6. Can J Vet Res. 2008. PMID: 18214155 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of the risk factors for shedding Salmonella with or without antimicrobial resistance in swine using multinomial regression method.Zoonoses Public Health. 2010 Nov;57 Suppl 1:85-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2010.01357.x. Zoonoses Public Health. 2010. PMID: 21083821
-
Salmonella in the pork production chain and its impact on human health in the European Union.Epidemiol Infect. 2017 Jun;145(8):1513-1526. doi: 10.1017/S095026881700036X. Epub 2017 Feb 28. Epidemiol Infect. 2017. PMID: 28241896 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Scoping Review About Salmonella spp. in Colombian Pig Farms from 2009 to Mid-2024.Animals (Basel). 2024 Dec 8;14(23):3542. doi: 10.3390/ani14233542. Animals (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39682507 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Draft Genome Sequence of Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica Serovar Putten Strain CRJJGF_00159 (Phylum Gammaproteobacteria).Genome Announc. 2016 Sep 1;4(5):e00895-16. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00895-16. Genome Announc. 2016. PMID: 27587814 Free PMC article.
-
Time course of Salmonella shedding and antibody response in naturally infected pigs during grower-finisher stage.Can J Vet Res. 2018 Apr;82(2):139-145. Can J Vet Res. 2018. PMID: 29755194 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of bacterial culture, polymerase chain reaction, and a mix-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the detection of Salmonella status in grow-to-finish pigs in western Canada with a Bayesian approach.Can J Vet Res. 2011 Oct;75(4):308-11. Can J Vet Res. 2011. PMID: 22468029 Free PMC article.
-
Salmonella Enterica Prevalence in Finishing Pigs at Slaughter Plants in Northern Italy.Ital J Food Saf. 2014 Apr 29;3(2):1609. doi: 10.4081/ijfs.2014.1609. eCollection 2014 Apr 17. Ital J Food Saf. 2014. PMID: 27800330 Free PMC article.
-
Temperature and oxygen dependent metabolite utilization by Salmonella enterica serovars Derby and Mbandaka.PLoS One. 2015 Mar 23;10(3):e0120450. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120450. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 25798944 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Todd E. Preliminary estimates of costs of foodborne disease in the United States. J Food Prot. 1989;52:595–601. - PubMed
-
- Miller GY, Liu X, McNamara PE, Barber DA. Influence of Salmonella in pigs preharvest and during pork processing on human health costs and risks from pork. J Food Prot. 2005;68:1788–1798. - PubMed
-
- Letellier A, Messier S, Paré J, Ménard J, Quessy S. Distribution of Salmonella in swine herds in Quebec. Vet Microbiol. 1999;67:299–306. - PubMed
-
- Letellier A, Messier S, Quessy S. Prevalence of Salmonella spp. and Yersinia enterocolitica in finishing swine at Canadian abattoirs. J Food Prot. 1999;62:22–25. - PubMed
-
- Rajić A, Keenliside J, McFall ME, et al. Longitudinal study of Salmonella species in 90 Alberta swine finishing farms. Vet Microbiol. 2005;105:47–56. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources