Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jul;25(7):1029-33.
doi: 10.3346/jkms.2010.25.7.1029. Epub 2010 Jun 17.

Detection of recurrence by 18F-FDG PET in patients with endometrial cancer showing no evidence of disease

Affiliations

Detection of recurrence by 18F-FDG PET in patients with endometrial cancer showing no evidence of disease

Sang-Young Ryu et al. J Korean Med Sci. 2010 Jul.

Abstract

This study assessed the feasibility of F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography ((18)F-FDG PET) in the post-therapy surveillance for patients with endometrial cancer showing no evidence of disease (NED). From April 1997 to June 2007, 127 patients with endometrial cancer showing NED were performed (18)F-FDG PET scan. The feasibility of (18)F-FDG PET for the early detection of recurrence in patients with endometrial cancer was evaluated retrospectively. Of the 127 patients, 32 patients showed positive lesions on (18)F-FDG PET scan. Nineteen (19/127 cases, 15%) of them were confirmed to have a recurrence clinically or histologically. The sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive value of (18)F-FDG PET for detecting recurrences in patients with endometrial cancer were 100%, 88%, 59% and 100%, respectively. In conclusion, (18)F-FDG PET may be a useful method for the post-therapy surveillance in patients with endometrial cancer.

Keywords: Endometrial Neoplasms; Positron-Emission Tomography; Recurrence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
A case where 18F-FDG PET detected a recurrent lesion in a patient showing no evidence of disease at conventional studies. CT scan detected no lesion and the level of tumor marker was within normal range. However, PET scan detected a recurrent lesion (arrow) at small bowel mesentery. Retrospective review of CT scan revealed a lesion smaller than 1 cm (arrow) at small bowel mesentery. Bowel obstruction symptoms developed three weeks later and surgical exploration revealed a recurrent lesion at small bowel mesentery.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Interval from the initial diagnosis to 18F-FDG PET for the patients with endometrial cancer who had recurrent disease.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Irvin WP, Rice LW, Berkowitz RS. Advances in the management of endometrial adenocarcinoma. A review. J Reprod Med. 2002;47:173–189. - PubMed
    1. John RL. Uterine Cancer. In: Jonathan SB, editor. Berek & Novak's Gynecology. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007. p. 1377.
    1. Sears JD, Greven KM, Hoen HM, Randall ME. Prognostic factors and treatment outcome for patients with locally recurrent endometrial cancer. Cancer. 1994;74:1303–1308. - PubMed
    1. Israel O, Kuten A. Early detection of cancer recurrence: 18F-FDG PET/CT can make a difference in diagnosis and patient care. J Nucl Med. 2007;48(Suppl 1):28S–35S. - PubMed
    1. Fung-Kee-Fung M, Dodge J, Elit L, Lukka H, Chambers A, Oliver T. Follow-up after primary therapy for endometrial cancer: a systematic review. Gynecol Oncol. 2006;101:520–529. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances