Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Oct;64(4):1015-26.
doi: 10.1002/mrm.22491.

A fully automatic and highly efficient navigator gating technique for high-resolution free-breathing acquisitions: Continuously adaptive windowing strategy

Affiliations
Free article

A fully automatic and highly efficient navigator gating technique for high-resolution free-breathing acquisitions: Continuously adaptive windowing strategy

P Jhooti et al. Magn Reson Med. 2010 Oct.
Free article

Abstract

A fully automatic and highly efficient free-breathing navigator gated technique, continuously adaptive windowing strategy (CLAWS), is presented. Using a novel and dynamic acquisition strategy that ensures all potential navigator acceptance windows are possible, CLAWS acquires an image with the highest possible efficiency regardless of variations in the respiratory pattern. Unnecessary prolongation of scan durations due to respiratory drift or navigator acceptance window adjustments are avoided. As CLAWS requires no setting of the acceptance window, nor monitoring of the navigator traces during the scan, operator dependence is minimized and ease of use improved. CLAWS was compared against a standard accept/reject algorithm (ARA) and an end-expiratory following ARA (EE-ARA) in 20 healthy subjects and 10 patients (ARA only). The respiratory efficiency was compared against the retrospectively determined best possible respiratory efficiency for each acquisition. On average, the difference between CLAWS scan times and best possible scan times was 0.6% (± 1.3%). For the ARA and EE-ARA techniques, mean differences were 14.4% (± 20.9%) and 32.6 ± 10.9%, respectively. Had the CLAWS algorithm been used with the ARA and EE-ARA traces, mean differences would have been 0.2% (± 1.1%) and 0.5% (± 1.7%), respectively. Image quality was the same for all techniques: respiratory gating, motion artifacts, navigator, and coronary artery imaging.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources