Hearing impairment in F-111 maintenance workers: the study of health outcomes in aircraft maintenance personnel (SHOAMP) general health and medical study
- PMID: 20593381
- DOI: 10.1002/ajim.20867
Hearing impairment in F-111 maintenance workers: the study of health outcomes in aircraft maintenance personnel (SHOAMP) general health and medical study
Abstract
Background: We sought to examine hearing loss in a group from the Royal Australian Air Force who undertook fuel tank maintenance on F-111 aircraft, with exposure to formulations containing ototoxins, relative to two different comparison groups.
Methods: Using pure-tone audiometry, hearing thresholds were assessed in 614 exposed personnel, 513 technical-trade comparisons (different base, same job), and 403 non-technical comparisons (same base, different job). We calculated percentage loss of hearing (PLH) and used regression models to examine whether there was an association between PLH and F-111 fuel tank maintenance, adjusting for possible confounders. In addition, the difference between the observed hearing thresholds and the expected thresholds based on an otologically normal population (ISO-7029-2003) was determined.
Results: The PLH ranged from nil to 96 (median 1.5, quartiles 0.3, 5.5). A logistic regression model showed no statistically significant difference in PLH among the three exposure groups (exposed vs. non-technical controls 1.1: 95% CI 0.7, 2.0 and exposed vs. technical OR 0.9: 95% CI 0.6, 1.3). The model also highlighted a number of other risk factors for PLH including age, tinnitus, smoking, depression, and use of depression medications. However, at all eight frequencies measured, all populations had lower than expected hearing thresholds based on published ISO-7029 medians.
Conclusions: Although there was no difference in PLH between the three exposure groups, the study did reveal a high degree of hearing loss between the 3 groups and a normal population.
© 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Similar articles
-
Hearing status among aircraft maintenance personnel in a commercial airline company.Noise Health. 2011 Sep-Oct;13(54):364-70. doi: 10.4103/1463-1741.85509. Noise Health. 2011. PMID: 21959117
-
Relative risk of elevated hearing threshold compared to ISO1999 normative populations for Royal Australian Air Force male personnel.Hear Res. 2012 Mar;285(1-2):65-76. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2012.01.007. Epub 2012 Feb 3. Hear Res. 2012. PMID: 22326290
-
Changes in the hearing status and noise injury prevention practices of Australian farmers from 1994 to 2008.J Agromedicine. 2011 Apr;16(2):127-42. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2011.554770. J Agromedicine. 2011. PMID: 21462025
-
[Interactions between solvents and noise: state of the art].G Ital Med Lav Ergon. 2006 Jan-Mar;28(1):20-4. G Ital Med Lav Ergon. 2006. PMID: 16705885 Review. Italian.
-
Noise-induced hearing loss and hearing conservation in mining.Occup Med (Lond). 2004 Aug;54(5):290-6. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqh075. Occup Med (Lond). 2004. PMID: 15289584 Review.
Cited by
-
Complex Mixtures: Array PBPK Modeling of Jet Fuel Components.Toxics. 2023 Feb 17;11(2):187. doi: 10.3390/toxics11020187. Toxics. 2023. PMID: 36851061 Free PMC article.
-
Impairment of color vision in aircraft maintenance workers.Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2011 Oct;84(7):723-33. doi: 10.1007/s00420-010-0600-9. Epub 2010 Nov 14. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2011. PMID: 21076964
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical