Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Mar;24(3):397-401.
doi: 10.3109/14767058.2010.497883. Epub 2010 Jul 1.

Effect of revised IOM weight gain guidelines on perinatal outcomes

Affiliations

Effect of revised IOM weight gain guidelines on perinatal outcomes

Donna R Halloran et al. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011 Mar.

Abstract

Objective: We sought to examine perinatal outcomes in women with a body mass index (BMI) of 25 kg/m(2) comparing those whose weight gain met 2009 IOM guidelines to women meeting 1990 IOM guidelines.

Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study utilizing birth records linked to hospital discharge data for all term, singleton infants born to overweight, Missouri residents (2000-2006) with a BMI of 25 kg/m(2). We excluded congenital anomalies, mothers with diabetes, hypertension, or previous cesarean delivery.

Results: Fourteen thousand nine hundred fifty-five women gained 25-35 lbs (1990 guidelines); 1.6% delivered low birth weight (LBW) infants and 1.1% delivered macrosomic infants. Eight thousand three hundred fifty women gained 15-25 lbs (2009 guidelines); 3.4% delivered LBW infants and 0.6% delivered macrosomic infants. Women who gained 15-25 lbs were 1.99 (95% CI 1.67, 2.38) times more likely to have a LBW infant and 0.59 (95% CI 0.40, 0.76) times less likely to deliver a macrosomic infant.

Conclusion: Limiting weight gain in women with a BMI of 25 kg/m(2), per the 2009 guidelines, increases the risk of LBW deliveries and decreases the risk of macrosomia but does not reduce associated adverse perinatal outcomes. Further studies should explore the optimal weight gain to reduce these outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. World Health Organization. Statistical Information System. [Last accessed 28 November 2009];Core Health Indicators Database. [Internet] 2008 Electronic citation. http://apps.who.int/whosis/database/core/core_select_process.cfm.
    1. World Health Organization. Media Centre Fact Sheets. [Last accessed 28 November 2009];Obesity and overweight [Internet] 2006 Electronic citation. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs311/en/index.html.
    1. Solomon CG, Willett WC, Carey VJ, Rich-Edwards J, Hunter DJ, Colditz GA, Stampfer MJ, Speizer FE, Spiegelman D, Manson JE. A prospective study of pregravid determinants of gestational diabetes. J Am Med Assoc. 1997;278:1078–1083. - PubMed
    1. O’Brien TE, Ray JG, Chan W. Maternal body mass index and the risk of preeclampsia: a systematic overview. Epidemiology. 2003;14:368–374. - PubMed
    1. Davis EM, Zyzanski SJ, Olson CM, Stange KC, Horwitz RI. Racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic differences in the incidence of obesity related to childbirth. Am J Public Health. 2009;99:294–299. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms