Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jul 1:10:192.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-10-192.

Bacterial migration through punctured surgical gloves under real surgical conditions

Affiliations

Bacterial migration through punctured surgical gloves under real surgical conditions

Nils-Olaf Hübner et al. BMC Infect Dis. .

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to confirm recent results from a previous study focussing on the development of a method to measure the bacterial translocation through puncture holes in surgical gloves under real surgical conditions.

Methods: An established method was applied to detect bacterial migration from the operating site through the punctured glove. Biogel double-gloving surgical gloves were used during visceral surgeries over a 6-month period. A modified Gaschen-bag method was used to retrieve organisms from the inner glove, and thus-obtained bacteria were compared with micro-organisms detected by an intra-operative swab.

Results: In 20 consecutive procedures, 194 gloves (98 outer gloves, 96 inner gloves) were examined. The rate of micro-perforations of the outer surgical glove was 10% with a median wearing time of 100 minutes (range: 20-175 minutes). Perforations occurred in 81% on the non-dominant hand, with the index finger most frequently (25%) punctured. In six cases, bacterial migration could be demonstrated microbiologically. In 5% (5/98) of outer gloves and in 1% (1/96) of the inner gloves, bacterial migration through micro-perforations was observed. For gloves with detected micro-perforations (n = 10 outer layers), the calculated migration was 50% (n = 5). The minimum wearing time was 62 minutes, with a calculated median wearing time of 71 minutes.

Conclusions: This study confirms previous results that bacterial migration through unnoticed micro-perforations in surgical gloves does occur under real practical surgical conditions. Undetected perforation of surgical gloves occurs frequently. Bacterial migration from the patient through micro-perforations on the hand of surgeons was confirmed, limiting the protective barrier function of gloves if worn over longer periods.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Gloves, perforations/migration detected and performance of the indicator system.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Tanner J. Surgical gloves: perforation and protection. J Perioper Pract. 2006;16(3):148–152. - PubMed
    1. Partecke LI, Goerdt AM, Langner I, Jaeger B, Assadian O, Heidecke CD, Kramer A, Huebner NO. Incidence of microperforation for surgical gloves depends on duration of wear. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2009;30(5):409–414. doi: 10.1086/597062. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Eklund AM, Ojajarvi J, Laitinen K, Valtonen M, Werkkala KA. Glove punctures and postoperative skin flora of hands in cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;74(1):149–153. doi: 10.1016/S0003-4975(02)03690-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Laine T, Kaipia A, Santavirta J, Aarnio P. Glove perforations in open and laparoscopic abdominal surgery: the feasibility of double gloving. Scand J Surg. 2004;93(1):73–76. - PubMed
    1. Brough SJ, Hunt TM, Barrie WW. Surgical glove perforations. Br J Surg. 1988;75(4):317. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800750408. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms