Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jul 1:5:52.
doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-52.

Implementing quality indicators in intensive care units: exploring barriers to and facilitators of behaviour change

Affiliations

Implementing quality indicators in intensive care units: exploring barriers to and facilitators of behaviour change

Maartje Lg de Vos et al. Implement Sci. .

Abstract

Background: Quality indicators are increasingly used in healthcare but there are various barriers hindering their routine use. To promote the use of quality indicators, an exploration of the barriers to and facilitating factors for their implementation among healthcare professionals and managers of intensive care units (ICUs) is advocated.

Methods: All intensivists, ICU nurses, and managers (n = 142) working at 54 Dutch ICUs who participated in training sessions to support future implementation of quality indicators completed a questionnaire on perceived barriers and facilitators. Three types of barriers related to knowledge, attitude, and behaviour were assessed using a five-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree).

Results: Behaviour-related barriers such as time constraints were most prominent (Mean Score, MS = 3.21), followed by barriers related to knowledge and attitude (MS = 3.62; MS = 4.12, respectively). Type of profession, age, and type of hospital were related to knowledge and behaviour. The facilitating factor perceived as most important by intensivists was administrative support (MS = 4.3; p = 0.02); for nurses, it was education (MS = 4.0; p = 0.01), and for managers, it was receiving feedback (MS = 4.5; p = 0.001).

Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that healthcare professionals and managers are familiar with using quality indicators to improve care, and that they have positive attitudes towards the implementation of quality indicators. Despite these facts, it is necessary to lower the barriers related to behavioural factors. In addition, as the barriers and facilitating factors differ among professions, age groups, and settings, tailored strategies are needed to implement quality indicators in daily practice.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Response to eleven statements regarding perceived barriers towards implementation of quality indicators.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Response to several items about factors that may facilitate the implementation of quality indicators.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Quality indicators. http://www.qualityindicators.ahrq.gov/introduction.htm - PubMed
    1. Commission for Health Improvement. NHS ratings. http://www.chi.nhs.uk/ratings
    1. Beata K, Mattias E, Jan L. Design and Implementation of a Performance Measurement System in Swedish Health Care Services: A Multiple Case Study of 6 Development Teams. Quality Management in Health Care. 2005;14:95–111. - PubMed
    1. Bourne M, Neely A, Platts K, Mills J. The success and failure of performance measurement initiatives: Perceptions of participating managers. International journal of operations & production management. 2002;22:1288–1310.
    1. Weiner BJ, Alexander JA, Shortell SM, Baker LC, Becker M, Geppert JJ. Quality improvement implementation and hospital performance on quality indicators. Health Serv Res. 2006;41:307–334. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00483.x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources