Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jul 2;10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S2.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-S1-S2.

Financing equitable access to antiretroviral treatment in South Africa

Affiliations

Financing equitable access to antiretroviral treatment in South Africa

Susan Cleary et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: While South Africa spends approximately 7.4% of GDP on healthcare, only 43% of these funds are spent in the public system, which is tasked with the provision of care to the majority of the population including a large proportion of those in need of antiretroviral treatment (ART). South Africa is currently debating the introduction of a National Health Insurance (NHI) system. Because such a universal health system could mean increased public healthcare funding and improved access to human resources, it could improve the sustainability of ART provision. This paper considers the minimum resources that would be required to achieve the proposed universal health system and contrasts these with the costs of scaled up access to ART between 2010 and 2020.

Methods: The costs of ART and universal coverage (UC) are assessed through multiplying unit costs, utilization and estimates of the population in need during each year of the planning cycle. Costs are from the provider's perspective reflected in real 2007 prices.

Results: The annual costs of providing ART increase from US$1 billion in 2010 to US$3.6 billion in 2020. If increases in funding to public healthcare only keep pace with projected real GDP growth, then close to 30% of these resources would be required for ART by 2020. However, an increase in the public healthcare resource envelope from 3.2% to 5%-6% of GDP would be sufficient to finance both ART and other services under a universal system (if based on a largely public sector model) and the annual costs of ART would not exceed 15% of the universal health system budget.

Conclusions: Responding to the HIV-epidemic is one of the many challenges currently facing South Africa. Whether this response becomes a "resource for democracy" or whether it undermines social cohesiveness within poor communities and between rich and poor communities will be partially determined by the steps that are taken during the next ten years. While the introduction of a universal system will be complex, it could generate a health system responsive to the needs of all South Africans.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. UNAIDS. AIDS epidemic update: December 2007. Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS and World Health Organisation. 2007.
    1. HIV & AIDS and STI National Strategic Plan 2007-2011. Pretoria: South African National AIDS Council (SANAC) 2007. pp. 1–136.
    1. National Antiretroviral Treatment Guidelines. Pretoria: National Department of Health. 2004.
    1. Mooney G. And now for vertical equity? Some concerns arising from Aboriginal health in Australia. Health Economics. 1996;5:99–103. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(199603)5:2<99::AID-HEC193>3.0.CO;2-N. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hogan B. Minister of Health's closing speech to the 4th SA AIDS Conference. Southern African AIDS Conference: 2009; Durban. 2009.

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances