Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2010 Jul 2;10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S4.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-S1-S4.

Differences in antiretroviral scale up in three South African provinces: the role of implementation management

Helen Schneider  1 , David Coetzee, Dingie Van Rensburg, Lucy Gilson
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Differences in antiretroviral scale up in three South African provinces: the role of implementation management

Helen Schneider et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: South Africa's antiretroviral programme is governed by defined national plans, establishing treatment targets and providing funding through ring-fenced conditional grants. However, in terms of the country's quasi-federal constitution, provincial governments bear the main responsibility for provision of health care, and have a certain amount of autonomy and therefore choice in the way their HIV/AIDS programmes are implemented.

Methods: The paper is a comparative case study of the early management of ART scale up in three South African provincial governments--Western Cape, Gauteng and Free State--focusing on both operational and strategic dimensions. Drawing on surveys of models of ART care and analyses of the policy process conducted in the three provinces between 2005 and 2007, as well as a considerable body of grey and indexed literature on ART scale up in South Africa, it draws links between implementation processes and variations in provincial ART coverage (low, medium and high) achieved in the three provinces.

Results: While they adopted similar chronic disease care approaches, the provinces differed with respect to political and managerial leadership of the programme, programme design, the balance between central standardisation and local flexibility, the effectiveness of monitoring and evaluation systems, and the nature and extent of external support and programme partnerships.

Conclusions: This case study points to the importance of sub-national programme processes and the influence of factors other than financing or human resource capacity, in understanding intervention scale up.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Coverage and numbers of adults on Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy (HAART), Free State, Western Cape and Gauteng, 2004-2007. Source: Personal communication, Leigh Johnson, 2009
Figure 2
Figure 2
Availability of medical and nursing personnel in 16 ART sites in three provinces, South Africa, 2005-2007 (Source: Schneider et al, 2008b)
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Mangham L, Hanson K. Scaling up in international health,: A review. Health Policy Plan. 2010;25:85–96. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czp066. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gilson L, Schneider H. Managing scaling up: what are the key issues? A commentary on Mangham and Hanson. Hlth Policy Plan. 2010;25:97–98. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czp067. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Adam MAA, Johnson LF. Estimation of adult antiretroviral treatment coverage in South Africa. S Afr Med J. 2009;99:661–667. - PubMed
    1. Nattrass N. South Africa’s ‘‘Rollout’’ of Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy A Critical Assessment. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2006;43:618–623. - PubMed
    1. Steytler N. Federal homogeneity from the Bottom up, Provincial Shaping of National HIV/AIDS Policy in South Africa. Publius. 2003;33:59–74.

Publication types

Substances