Non-diabetic hyperglycaemia correlates with angiographic coronary artery disease prevalence and severity

Abstract

Aim: The role of glycaemia as a coronary artery disease (CAD) risk factor is controversial, and the optimal glucose level is still a matter of debate. For this reason, we assessed the prevalence and severity of angiographic CAD across hyperglycaemia categories and in relation to haemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) levels.

Methods: We studied 273 consecutive patients without prior revascularization undergoing coronary angiography for suspected ischaemic pain. CAD severity was assessed using three angiographic scores: the Gensini's score; extent score; and arbitrary index. Patients were grouped, according to 2003 American Diabetes Association criteria, into those with normal fasting glucose (NFG), impaired fasting glucose (IFG) and diabetes mellitus (DM).

Results: CAD prevalence was 2.5-fold higher in both the IFG and DM groups compared with the NFG group. Deterioration of glycaemic profile was a multivariate predictor of angiographic CAD severity (extent score: P=0.027; arbitrary index: P=0.007). HbA(1c) levels were significantly higher among CAD patients (P=0.016) and in those with two or more diseased vessels (P=0.023) compared with the non-CAD group. HbA(1c) levels remained predictive of CAD prevalence even after adjusting for conventional risk factors, including DM (adjusted OR: 1.853; 95% CI: 1.269-2.704).

Conclusion: Non-diabetic hyperglycaemia, assessed either categorically by fasting glucose categories or continuously by HbA(1c) levels, correlates with the poorest angiographic outcomes.