Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Mar;17(1 Suppl):29-39.
doi: 10.1177/1757975909358361.

Disparity in smoking prevalence by education: can we reduce it?

Shu-Hong Zhu  1 , Kiandra Hebert, Shiushing Wong, Sharon Cummins, Anthony Gamst
Affiliations

Disparity in smoking prevalence by education: can we reduce it?

Shu-Hong Zhu et al. Glob Health Promot. 2010 Mar.

Abstract

Can an intervention program that is highly effective in reducing the prevalence of an unhealthy behavior in the general population also reduce the disparity among its subgroups? That depends on what measure of disparity is used. Using simple algebraic models, this study demonstrates that disparity measured in terms of relative difference between two groups tends to increase when the prevalence of the behavior is in decline. The study then shows an empirical example, by analyzing the effects of the California tobacco control program on smoking prevalence of two education groups, the lowest (less than 12 years) and the highest (16 years or more). It examines the data from four California Tobacco Surveys covering the years 1996, 1999, 2002, and 2005. The effects of three components of the tobacco control program known to be effective in decreasing prevalence (media, worksite policy, and price) on the two education groups are assessed. The smoking prevalence for the two groups is obtained from these four surveys and a regression line is computed for each education group from 1996 to 2005. Results show that the California program is effective with both low education and high education groups and that the rate of decline in smoking prevalence from 1996 to 2005 is no smaller for the low education group than for the high education group. The paper then discusses that an analysis of disparity based on relative difference, however, could result in misleading recommendations that an intervention like the California tobacco program needs to change from its current whole-population approach to one that focuses on targeting subgroups because it has not reduced disparity. It proposes that research should focus more on increasing the rate of change among less advantage groups and less on the relative disparity compared to some other group.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Comparison of Two Groups for Disparity (Hypothetical Examples)
Figure 2
Figure 2
Smoking Prevalence for the Two Education Groups in California, 1996– 2005
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Yen IH, Syme SL. The social environment and health: a discussion of the epidemiologic literature. Annu Rev Public Health. 1999;20:287–308. - PubMed
    1. Williams DR, Collins C. US Socioeconomic and racial differences in health: patterns and explanations. Annu Rev Sociol. 1995;21:349–86.
    1. Schnittker J, McLeod JD. The social psychology of health disparities. Annu Rev Sociol. 2005;31:75–103.
    1. Fagan P, Moolchan ET, Lawrence D, Fernander A, Ponder PK. Identifying health disparities across the tobacco continuum. Addiction. 2007;102(Suppl 2):5–29. - PubMed
    1. Ellickson PL, Orlando M, Tucker JS, Klein DJ. From adolescence to young adulthood: racial/ethnic disparities in smoking. Am J Public Health. 2004;94:293–299. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types