Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2010 Jul;126(1):169-179.
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181da8685.

Indications for performing carpal tunnel surgery: clinical quality measures

Melinda A Maggard  1 , Neil G Harness, Walter T Chang, Janak A Parikh, Steven M Asch, Teryl K Nuckols; Carpal Tunnel Quality Group
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Indications for performing carpal tunnel surgery: clinical quality measures

Melinda A Maggard et al. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Jul.

Erratum in

  • Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Feb;127(2):1024

Abstract

Background: Rates of carpal tunnel surgery vary for unclear reasons. In this study, the authors developed measures determining when surgery is necessary (benefits exceed risks), inappropriate (risks outweigh benefits), or optional.

Methods: Measures were developed using a modified-Delphi panel. Clinical scenarios were defined incorporating symptom severity, symptom duration, clinical probability of carpal tunnel syndrome, electrodiagnostic testing, and nonoperative treatment response. A multidisciplinary panel of 11 carpal tunnel syndrome experts rated appropriateness of surgery for each scenario on a scale ranging from 1 to 9 scale (7 to 9, surgery is necessary; 1 to 3, surgery is inappropriate).

Results: Of 90 scenarios (36 for mild, 36 for moderate, and 18 for severe symptoms), panelists judged carpal tunnel surgery as necessary for 16, inappropriate for 37, and optional for 37 scenarios. For mild symptoms, surgery is generally necessary when clinical probability of carpal tunnel syndrome is high, there is a positive electrodiagnostic test, and there has been unsuccessful nonoperative treatment. For moderate symptoms, surgery is generally necessary with a positive electrodiagnostic test involving two or more of the following: high clinical probability, unsuccessful nonoperative treatment, and symptoms lasting longer than 12 months. Surgery is generally inappropriate for mild to moderate symptoms involving two or more of the following: low clinical probability, no electrodiagnostic confirmation, and nonoperative treatment not attempted. For severe symptoms, surgery is generally necessary with a positive electrodiagnostic test or unsuccessful nonoperative treatment.

Conclusions: These are the first formal measures assessing appropriateness of carpal tunnel surgery. Applying these measures can identify underuse (failure to provide necessary care) and overuse (providing inappropriate care), giving insight into variations in receipt of this procedure.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Keller RB, Largay AM, Soule DN, Katz JN. Maine Carpal Tunnel Study: Small area variations. J Hand Surg (Am.) 1998;23:692–696.
    1. McDonald AP, Lourie GM III. Complex surgical conditions of the hand: Avoiding the pitfalls. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;433:65–71.
    1. Schreiber JE, Foran MP, Schreiber DJ, Wilgis EF. Common risk factors seen in secondary carpal tunnel surgery. Ann Plast Surg. 2005;55:262–265.
    1. al-Qattan MM Bowen V, Manktelow RT. Factors associated with poor outcome following primary carpal tunnel release in non-diabetic patients. J Hand Surg (Br.) 1994;19:622–625.
    1. Gerritsen AA, de Vet HC, Scholten RJ, Bertelsmann FW, de Krom MC, Bouter LM. Splinting vs surgery in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2002;288:1245–1251.

Publication types

MeSH terms