The effect of different doses of vitamin D(3) on markers of vascular health in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomised controlled trial
- PMID: 20596692
- DOI: 10.1007/s00125-010-1838-1
The effect of different doses of vitamin D(3) on markers of vascular health in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomised controlled trial
Abstract
Aims/hypothesis: Low 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels predict future cardiovascular events and are common in patients with type 2 diabetes. We compared the effect of 100,000 and 200,000 IU doses of vitamin D(3) on endothelial function, blood pressure and markers of glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Methods: This was a randomised, parallel group, placebo-controlled trial. Patients with type 2 diabetes and baseline 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels <100 nmol/l were enrolled from community and hospital-based diabetes clinics. Participants were assessed in a university department of clinical pharmacology and received a single oral dose of placebo or vitamin D(3) (100,000 IU or 200,000 IU) at baseline, randomly allocated via numbered bottles prepared offsite; participants and investigators were both blinded to treatment allocation. Endothelial function, office blood pressure, B-type natriuretic peptide, insulin resistance and glycosylated haemoglobin were measured at baseline, and at 8 and 16 weeks.
Results: We randomised 61 participants to the three groups (placebo 22, 100,000 IU vitamin D(3) 19, 200,000 IU vitamin D(3) 20). There was no significant difference in the primary outcome of endothelial function at 8 weeks (placebo 5.2%, n = 22; 100,000 IU 4.3%, n = 19; 200,000 IU 4.9%, n = 17) or at 16 weeks. Insulin resistance and glycosylated haemoglobin did not improve with either dose of vitamin D(3). On covariate analysis, systolic blood pressure was significantly lower in both treatment arms than in the placebo group at 8 weeks (placebo 146.4 mmHg, 100,000 IU 141.4 mmHg [p = 0.04 vs placebo], 200,000 IU 136.8 mmHg [p = 0.03 vs placebo]). B-type natriuretic peptide levels were significantly lower in the 200,000 IU group by 16 weeks (placebo 34 pg/ml, 200,000 IU 21 pg/ml, p = 0.02). No significant excess of adverse effects was noted in the treatment arms.
Conclusions/interpretation: High-dose vitamin D(3) improved systolic blood pressure and B-type natriuretic peptide levels, but not endothelial function, insulin resistance or glycosylated haemoglobin in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Comment in
-
Nutrition: Vitamin D improves blood pressure in type 2 diabetes.Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2010 Oct;6(10):533. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2010.137. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2010. PMID: 21080539 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Effect of vitamin D supplementation on oral glucose tolerance in individuals with low vitamin D status and increased risk for developing type 2 diabetes (EVIDENCE): A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial.Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017 Jan;19(1):133-141. doi: 10.1111/dom.12794. Epub 2016 Nov 9. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017. PMID: 27717236 Clinical Trial.
-
The effects of vitamin D₂ or D₃ supplementation on glycaemic control and related metabolic parameters in people at risk of type 2 diabetes: protocol of a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial.BMC Public Health. 2013 Oct 23;13:999. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-999. BMC Public Health. 2013. PMID: 24152375 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Effect of large doses of parenteral vitamin D on glycaemic control and calcium/phosphate metabolism in patients with stable type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomised, placebo-controlled, prospective pilot study.Swiss Med Wkly. 2014 Mar 20;144:w13942. doi: 10.4414/smw.2014.13942. Swiss Med Wkly. 2014. PMID: 24652692 Clinical Trial.
-
The effect of vitamin D replacement on markers of vascular health in stroke patients - a randomised controlled trial.Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2012 Oct;22(10):864-70. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2010.11.001. Epub 2010 Dec 30. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2012. PMID: 21194910 Clinical Trial.
-
Vitamin D supplementation for sickle cell disease.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 May 28;5(5):CD010858. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010858.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 32462740 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
The optimal vitamin D cut-off value associated with hyperglycemia in an Iranian population.J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2019 Dec 10;19(1):5-12. doi: 10.1007/s40200-019-00433-y. eCollection 2020 Jun. J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2019. PMID: 32550151 Free PMC article.
-
Vitamin D and risk of future hypertension: meta-analysis of 283,537 participants.Eur J Epidemiol. 2013 Mar;28(3):205-21. doi: 10.1007/s10654-013-9790-2. Epub 2013 Mar 2. Eur J Epidemiol. 2013. PMID: 23456138
-
What is the impact of vitamin D supplementation on glycemic control in people with type-2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trails.BMC Endocr Disord. 2023 Jan 16;23(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12902-022-01209-x. BMC Endocr Disord. 2023. PMID: 36647067 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of Vitamin D Fractions in Obese Hypertensive Patients.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 4;17(5):1660. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17051660. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020. PMID: 32143350 Free PMC article.
-
Vitamin D deficiency is associated with high prevalence of diabetes in Kuwaiti adults: results from a national survey.BMC Public Health. 2016 Feb 1;16:100. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-2758-x. BMC Public Health. 2016. PMID: 26833056 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical