Adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities and participation in decision making: ethical considerations for professional-client practice
- PMID: 20597745
- DOI: 10.1352/1934-9556-48.2.112
Adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities and participation in decision making: ethical considerations for professional-client practice
Abstract
In this article, the authors challenge professionals to re-examine assumptions about basic concepts and their implications in supporting adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities. The authors focus on decisions with significant implications, such as planning transition from school to adult life, changing living environments, and managing health issues. The analysis highlights important concepts that are less often addressed: autonomy, empowerment, participation in decision making, asymmetrical power, outer-directedness, and respect for persons. The authors suggest that professionals adopt a moral principle of respect for persons as an overarching guiding principle in their work with adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities. The value of self-determination and person-centered planning processes are placed in the larger scope of ethical practice. The authors offer a set of practical considerations that encourage respect for these individuals by involving them in the decision-making process in situations that have a large impact on them.
Similar articles
-
Autonomy and competency--self-determination in the lives of adults with developmental disabilities.Bioethics Forum. 1999 Summer;15(2):19-30. Bioethics Forum. 1999. PMID: 15675064
-
Dementia diagnosis and disclosure: a dilemma in practice.J Clin Nurs. 2004 Mar;13(3a):22-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2004.00922.x. J Clin Nurs. 2004. PMID: 15028035
-
The relationships among three factors affecting the financial decision-making abilities of adults with mild intellectual disabilities.J Intellect Disabil Res. 2005 Mar;49(Pt 3):210-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2005.00647.x. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2005. PMID: 15713196
-
Respect in critical care: a foundational ethical principle.AACN Adv Crit Care. 2007 Apr-Jun;18(2):149-56. doi: 10.1097/01.AACN.0000269258.14418.1e. AACN Adv Crit Care. 2007. PMID: 17473543 Review.
-
[Patient autonomy and informed consent in clinical practice].Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2007 Jun 14;127(12):1644-7. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2007. PMID: 17571103 Review. Norwegian.
Cited by
-
SPAN Website for Remote Intervention with Autistic Adolescents and Young Adults: Feasibility and Usability.Children (Basel). 2023 Sep 6;10(9):1514. doi: 10.3390/children10091514. Children (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37761475 Free PMC article.
-
Validation of an instrument to assess the delivery of patient-centred care to people with intellectual disabilities as perceived by professionals.BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jul 11;17(1):472. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2424-8. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017. PMID: 28693569 Free PMC article.
-
Gender diversity in autistic clients: an ethical perspective.Front Psychiatry. 2023 Sep 20;14:1244107. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1244107. eCollection 2023. Front Psychiatry. 2023. PMID: 37799398 Free PMC article.
-
Perspectives on the essential skills of healthcare decision making in children and adolescents with intellectual disability.Int J Equity Health. 2024 Jun 7;23(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12939-024-02204-5. Int J Equity Health. 2024. PMID: 38849806 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Consensus on a conversation aid for shared decision making with people with intellectual disabilities in the palliative phase.J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2021 Nov;34(6):1538-1548. doi: 10.1111/jar.12898. Epub 2021 Jun 1. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2021. PMID: 34060161 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical