Colon perforation during colonoscopy: surgical versus conservative management
- PMID: 2059801
- DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800780509
Colon perforation during colonoscopy: surgical versus conservative management
Abstract
A survey of endoscopy units in the West Midlands, UK, was undertaken to ascertain the management of colonic perforation during colonoscopy. Fifteen perforations were reported from a total of 17,500 colonoscopies performed in 14 units (a rate of 0.09 per cent). In seven patients the diagnosis was suspected or diagnosed immediately and in the remaining eight 2-72 h later. Four patients with associated pathology (carcinoma, Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis and a polyp) had resection and primary anastomosis. Seven patients had a simple oversew, four of these having had a delayed diagnosis. In four cases the site of perforation was not identified, but only one patient had conservative treatment. Three patients had drainage and a defunctioning colostomy. There was no significant morbidity following treatment. It is recommended that patients who have had a good bowel preparation should be treated conservatively unless there is a large perforation or an underlying carcinoma.
Comment in
-
Colonic perforation during colonoscopy.Br J Surg. 1992 Mar;79(3):282. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800790341. Br J Surg. 1992. PMID: 1555104 No abstract available.
-
Colon perforation during colonoscopy: surgical versus conservative management.Br J Surg. 1991 Nov;78(11):1402. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800781149. Br J Surg. 1991. PMID: 1760715 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
