Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010 Nov;68(11):2033-116.
doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2010.05.016. Epub 2010 Jun 4.

EPR dosimetry with tooth enamel: A review

Affiliations
Review

EPR dosimetry with tooth enamel: A review

Paola Fattibene et al. Appl Radiat Isot. 2010 Nov.

Abstract

When tooth enamel is exposed to ionizing radiation, radicals are formed, which can be detected using electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) techniques. EPR dosimetry using tooth enamel is based on the (presumed) correlation between the intensity or amplitude of some of the radiation-induced signals with the dose absorbed in the enamel. In the present paper a critical review is given of this widely applied dosimetric method. The first part of the paper is fairly fundamental and deals with the main properties of tooth enamel and some of its model systems (e.g., synthetic apatites). Considerable attention is also paid to the numerous radiation-induced and native EPR signals and the radicals responsible for them. The relevant methods for EPR detection, identification and spectrum analyzing are reviewed from a general point of view. Finally, the needs for solid-state modelling and studies of the linearity of the dose response are investigated. The second part is devoted to the practical implementation of EPR dosimetry using enamel. It concerns specific problems of preparation of samples, their irradiation and spectrum acquisition. It also describes how the dosimetric signal intensity and dose can be retrieved from the EPR spectra. Special attention is paid to the energy dependence of the EPR response and to sources of uncertainties. Results of and problems encountered in international intercomparisons and epidemiological studies are also dealt with. In the final section the future of EPR dosimetry with tooth enamel is analyzed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

  • Use of optical techniques to evaluate the ionizing radiation effects on biological specimens.
    Fujita H, Watanabe TM. Fujita H, et al. J Radiat Res. 2024 Dec 16;65(Supplement_1):i117-i125. doi: 10.1093/jrr/rrae016. J Radiat Res. 2024. PMID: 39679890 Free PMC article. Review.
  • Tooth Retrospective Dosimetry Using Electron Paramagnetic Resonance: Influence of Irradiated Dental Composites.
    Desmet CM, Djurkin A, Dos Santos-Goncalvez AM, Dong R, Kmiec MM, Kobayashi K, Rychert K, Beun S, Leprince JG, Leloup G, Levêque P, Gallez B. Desmet CM, et al. PLoS One. 2015 Jun 30;10(6):e0131913. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131913. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 26125565 Free PMC article.
  • Carbon-centered radicals in γ-irradiated bone substituting biomaterials based on hydroxyapatite.
    Sadlo J, Strzelczak G, Lewandowska-Szumiel M, Sterniczuk M, Pajchel L, Michalik J. Sadlo J, et al. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2012 Sep;23(9):2061-8. doi: 10.1007/s10856-012-4680-9. Epub 2012 May 26. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2012. PMID: 22639150
  • Comparison of three methods of EPR retrospective dosimetry in watch glass.
    Marciniak A, Juniewicz M, Ciesielski B, Prawdzik-Dampc A, Karczewski J. Marciniak A, et al. Front Public Health. 2022 Nov 17;10:1063769. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1063769. eCollection 2022. Front Public Health. 2022. PMID: 36466521 Free PMC article.
  • RENEB Inter-Laboratory Comparison 2021: Inter-Assay Comparison of Eight Dosimetry Assays.
    Port M, Barquinero JF, Endesfelder D, Moquet J, Oestreicher U, Terzoudi G, Trompier F, Vral A, Abe Y, Ainsbury L, Alkebsi L, Amundson SA, Badie C, Baeyens A, Balajee AS, Balázs K, Barnard S, Bassinet C, Beaton-Green LA, Beinke C, Bobyk L, Brochard P, Brzoska K, Bucher M, Ciesielski B, Cuceu C, Discher M, D Oca MC, Domínguez I, Doucha-Senf S, Dumitrescu A, Duy PN, Finot F, Garty G, Ghandhi SA, Gregoire E, Goh VST, Güçlü I, Hadjiiska L, Hargitai R, Hristova R, Ishii K, Kis E, Juniewicz M, Kriehuber R, Lacombe J, Lee Y, Lopez Riego M, Lumniczky K, Mai TT, Maltar-Strmečki N, Marrale M, Martinez JS, Marciniak A, Maznyk N, McKeever SWS, Meher PK, Milanova M, Miura T, Monteiro Gil O, Montoro A, Moreno Domene M, Mrozik A, Nakayama R, O'Brien G, Oskamp D, Ostheim P, Pajic J, Pastor N, Patrono C, Pujol-Canadell M, Prieto Rodriguez MJ, Repin M, Romanyukha A, Rößler U, Sabatier L, Sakai A, Scherthan H, Schüle S, Seong KM, Sevriukova O, Sholom S, Sommer S, Suto Y, Sypko T, Szatmári T, Takahashi-Sugai M, Takebayashi K, Testa A, Testard I, Tichy A, Triantopoulou S, Tsuyama N, Unverricht-Yeboah M, Valente M, Van Hoey O, Wilkins RC, Wojcik A, Wojewodzka M, Younghyun L, Zafiropoulos D, Abend M. Port M, et al. Radiat Res. 2023 Jun 1;199(6):535-555. doi: 10.1667/RADE-22-00207.1. Radiat Res. 2023. PMID: 37310880 Free PMC article.

LinkOut - more resources