Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jul;118(7):897-901.
doi: 10.1289/ehp.1002285. Epub 2010 Jun 8.

The case for a global ban on asbestos

Affiliations

The case for a global ban on asbestos

Joseph LaDou et al. Environ Health Perspect. 2010 Jul.

Abstract

Background: All forms of asbestos are now banned in 52 countries. Safer products have replaced many materials that once were made with it. Nonetheless, many countries still use, import, and export asbestos and asbestos-containing products, and in those that have banned other forms of asbestos, the so-called "controlled use" of chrysotile asbestos is often exempted from the ban. In fact, chrysotile has accounted for > 95% of all the asbestos used globally.

Objective: We examined and evaluated the literature used to support the exemption of chrysotile asbestos from the ban and how its exemption reflects the political and economic influence of the asbestos mining and manufacturing industry.

Discussion: All forms of asbestos, including chrysotile, are proven human carcinogens. All forms cause malignant mesothelioma and lung and laryngeal cancers, and may cause ovarian, gastrointestinal, and other cancers. No exposure to asbestos is without risk. Illnesses and deaths from asbestos exposure are entirely preventable.

Conclusions: All countries of the world have an obligation to their citizens to join in the international endeavor to ban the mining, manufacture, and use of all forms of asbestos. An international ban is urgently needed. There is no medical or scientific basis to exempt chrysotile from the worldwide ban of asbestos.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. Toxicological Profile for Asbestos. Atlanta, GA: Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry; 2001. [[accessed 17 May 2010]]. Available: http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp61.html.
    1. Albin M, Magnani C, Krstev S, Rapiti E, Shefer I. Asbestos and cancer: an overview of current trends in Europe. Environ Health Perspect. 1999;107(suppl 2):289–298. - PMC - PubMed
    1. American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. Asbestos: TLV Chemical Substances 7th Edition Documentation. Cincinnati, OH: American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists; 2001. Publication No. 7DOC-040.
    1. Ascoli V, Cavone D, Merler E, Barbieri PG, Romeo L, Nardi F, et al. Mesothelioma in blood related subjects: report of 11 clusters among 1954 Italy cases and review of the literature. Am J Ind Med. 2007;50(5):357–369. - PubMed
    1. Ashford NA, Castleman B, Frank AL, Giannasi F, Goldman LR, Greenberg M, et al. The International Commission on Occupational Health (ICOH) and its influence on international organizations. Int J Occup Environ Health. 2002;8(2):156–162. - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances