Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2010 Jun;40(3):139-43.
doi: 10.5051/jpis.2010.40.3.139. Epub 2010 Jun 25.

I-shaped incisions for papilla reconstruction in second stage implant surgery

Affiliations
Case Reports

I-shaped incisions for papilla reconstruction in second stage implant surgery

Eun-Kwon Lee et al. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2010 Jun.

Abstract

Purpose: Pink gingival esthetic especially on the anterior teeth has been an important success criterion in implant-supported restoration. Inter-implant papillae are a critical factor for implant esthetics, and various techniques for inter-implant papilla reconstruction have been introduced. The aim of this study is to suggest and evaluate a surgical technique for reconstructing inter-implant papillae.

Methods: A 28-year-old man had an implant placed on the #13 and #14 area. Four months after implant placement, a second stage surgery was planned for inter-implant papilla reconstruction. At the time of the abutment connection, I-type incisions were performed on the #13i & #14i area followed by full-thickness flap elevation and connection of a healing abutment on underlying fixtures without suture.

Results: Two weeks after the second stage implant surgery, soft tissue augmentation between the two implants was achieved.

Conclusions: I-shaped incisions for papilla reconstruction performed during the second stage implant surgery were useful for inter-implant papilla reconstruction and showed a good esthetic result.

Keywords: Dental esthetics; Dental implants; Dental papilla.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Preoperative panoramic view. Residual root on #13 is observed.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Four months after implant placement: facial view.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Four months after implant placement: occlusal view.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Schematic drawing of I-type incision. Labial horizontal incision: 0.5-1 mm inside from the border of implant. Vertical incision: middle line. Palatal horizontal incision: border of implant.
Figure 5
Figure 5
I-incision on #13i.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Healing abutment connection on #13i.
Figure 7
Figure 7
I-incision on #14i.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Healing abutment connection on #14i: occlusal view.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Healing abutment connection on #14i: facial view.
Figure 10
Figure 10
Two weeks after second-stage surgery: occlusal view.
Figure 11
Figure 11
Two weeks after second-stage surgery: facial view.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Albrektsson T, Dahl E, Enbom L, Engevall S, Engquist B, Eriksson AR, et al. Osseointegrated oral implants: a Swedish multicenter study of 8139 consecutively inserted Nobelpharma implants. J Periodontol. 1988;59:287–296. - PubMed
    1. Grunder U. The inlay-graft technique to create papillae between implants. J Esthet Dent. 1997;9:165–168. - PubMed
    1. Palacci P. Papilla regeneration technique. In: Palacci P, Ericsson I, Engstrand P, Rangert B, editors. Optimal implant positioning & soft tissue management for the Branemark system. Chicago: Quintessence Pub. Co.; 1995. pp. 59–70.
    1. Nemcovsky CE, Moses O, Artzi Z. Interproximal papillae reconstruction in maxillary implants. J Periodontol. 2000;71:308–314. - PubMed
    1. Tarnow DP, Eskow RN. Considerations for single-unit esthetic implant restorations. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 1995;16:778–788. - PubMed

Publication types