Microsuction aural toilet in ENT outpatients: a questionnaire to evaluate the patient experience
- PMID: 20607265
- DOI: 10.1007/s00405-010-1326-8
Microsuction aural toilet in ENT outpatients: a questionnaire to evaluate the patient experience
Abstract
Microsuction toilet of debris from the ear canal is a commonly performed procedure within the ENT outpatient clinic. This department has received two complaints from patients following microsuction aural toilet over the past year. These cases will be discussed. We wish to assess the frequency of side effects following aural microsuction in our department. A prospective questionnaire studied 164 patients undergoing aural microsuction over a 3 month period. From the total of 164 patients surveyed, only 74 (45%) did not report any adverse effects. Patients with mastoid cavities reported higher levels of vertigo when compared to those with normal ears (p < 0.001). A high proportion of patients have reported adverse side effects following aural microsuction. Medical staff should also be aware that certain patient subgroups are more prone to adverse effects. It would be appropriate to ensure that patients are counselled before suction takes place.
Similar articles
-
Nystagmus and Vertigo During Aural Toilet Using Microsuction.Audiol Res. 2025 Mar 19;15(2):33. doi: 10.3390/audiolres15020033. Audiol Res. 2025. PMID: 40126281 Free PMC article.
-
Aural microsuction for wax impaction: survey of efficacy and patient perception.J Laryngol Otol. 2014 Jul;128(7):621-5. doi: 10.1017/S0022215114000796. Epub 2014 Jul 14. J Laryngol Otol. 2014. PMID: 25017385
-
Noise levels generated within the external auditory canal during microsuction aural toilet and the effect on hearing: a prospective controlled series.Clin Otolaryngol. 2009 Feb;34(1):21-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2008.01841.x. Clin Otolaryngol. 2009. PMID: 19260881
-
Aural microsuction.BMJ. 2017 Jun 29;357:j2908. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j2908. BMJ. 2017. PMID: 28663220 Review. No abstract available.
-
[Of the expert's office: accusations of medical negligence while cleaning the external meatus].Laryngorhinootologie. 2012 Jul;91(7):447-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1314797. Epub 2012 Jun 22. Laryngorhinootologie. 2012. PMID: 22730035 Review. German. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Aural toilet (ear cleaning) for chronic suppurative otitis media.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Sep 14;9(9):CD013057. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013057.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 9;6:CD013057. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013057.pub3. PMID: 32926406 Free PMC article. Updated.
-
Nystagmus and Vertigo During Aural Toilet Using Microsuction.Audiol Res. 2025 Mar 19;15(2):33. doi: 10.3390/audiolres15020033. Audiol Res. 2025. PMID: 40126281 Free PMC article.
-
Treatment of impacted ear wax: a case for increased community-based microsuction.BJGP Open. 2020 Jun 23;4(2):bjgpopen20X101064. doi: 10.3399/bjgpopen20X101064. Print 2020 Jun. BJGP Open. 2020. PMID: 32238391 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Aural microsuction: an analysis of post-procedure patient safety incidents.Ir J Med Sci. 2024 Apr;193(2):945-947. doi: 10.1007/s11845-023-03540-1. Epub 2023 Oct 4. Ir J Med Sci. 2024. PMID: 37792209
-
Assessing patient satisfaction with a microsuction service in general practice: a comparative study.BJGP Open. 2019 Jul 23;3(2):bjgpopen19X101649. doi: 10.3399/bjgpopen19X101649. Print 2019 Jul. BJGP Open. 2019. PMID: 31366680 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous