Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2011 Feb;26(2):116-22.
doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1436-4. Epub 2010 Jul 7.

Patient perspectives of clinical care and patient navigation in follow-up of abnormal mammography

Karen Donelan  1 , Johanna R Mailhot, David Dutwin, Kristen Barnicle, Sarah Abernethy Oo, Karin Hobrecker, Sanja Percac-Lima, Bruce A Chabner
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Patient perspectives of clinical care and patient navigation in follow-up of abnormal mammography

Karen Donelan et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Racial and ethnic disparities in cancer care and survival are well documented. Patient navigation has been shown to improve timely follow-up of abnormal breast screenings for underserved patients. Few studies showed the impact of navigation on patient experiences of care.

Objective: We compared the experiences of patients enrolled in a patient navigator program and non-navigated patients referred to a hospital breast center for follow-up of abnormal mammogram in an underserved community health center population.

Design: Group comparison study using data from a mail and telephone survey to measure the experience of navigated and non-navigated patients.

Participants: English- and Spanish-speaking patients with abnormal mammography attending the Avon Breast Center between April 1, 2005 and April 30, 2007. Seventy-two navigated patients and 181 non-navigated patients completed surveys; the survey response rate was 53.6%.

Main measures: Timeliness of care, preparation for the visit to the breast center, ease of access, quality of care, provider communication, unmet need and patient satisfaction.

Key results: Most measures of the patient experience did not differ between navigated and non-navigated patients. Overall quality of care was rated as excellent (55% vs 62%, p = 0.294). Navigated patients were significantly more likely than non-navigated to 'definitely' understand what to expect at their visit (79% vs 60%, p = 0.003), to receive a reminder letter or telephone call (89% vs 77%, p = 0.029), and to feel welcome (89% vs 75%, p = 0.012). Navigated patients were less likely than non-navigated to rate the concern shown for their cultural/religious beliefs as excellent (45% vs 54%, p = 0.014).

Conclusions: Assessing patient perspectives is essential to evaluate the success of quality improvement interventions. In our center, we measured few significant disparities in the perceptions of care of these two very different populations of patients, although, there are still areas in which our program needs improvement. Further research is needed to understand the effectiveness of patient navigation programs in reducing racial and ethnic disparities.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Length of waiting times at different stages of appointment at the Avon Center (navigated n = 72, non-navigated n = 181).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Needs for support and assistance received in each domain (navigated n = 72, non-navigated n = 181).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Ries LAG, Melbert D, Krapcho M et al (eds). SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2004, National Cancer Institute. Available from URL: http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2004/ [accessed June 8, 2010].
    1. Smedley BD, Stith AY, Nelson AR (eds). Unequal treatment: Confronting racial and ethnic disparities in health care. Institute of Medicine Committee on Understanding and Eliminating Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care. Washington, DC: National Academies Press 2003. - PubMed
    1. US Department of Health and Human Services. Making cancer health disparities history. Trans-HHS Cancer Health Disparities Progress Review Group. March 2004. Available from URL: http://www.hhs.gov/chdprg/pdf/chdprg.pdf [accessed June 8, 2010].
    1. Bradley CJ, Given CW, Roberts C. Disparities in cancer diagnosis and survival. Cancer. 2001;91(1):178–188. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(20010101)91:1<178::AID-CNCR23>3.0.CO;2-S. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ayanian JZ, Weissman JS, Schneider EC, Ginsburg JA, Zaslavsky AM. Unmet health needs of uninsured adults in the United States. JAMA. 2000;284(16):2061–2069. doi: 10.1001/jama.284.16.2061. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types