Interobserver and intraobserver variations in tibial pilon fracture classification systems
- PMID: 20609577
- DOI: 10.1016/j.foot.2010.06.002
Interobserver and intraobserver variations in tibial pilon fracture classification systems
Abstract
Background: Tibial pilon injuries are a complex group of fractures, whose classification and radiological assessment has been under constant reform. Till date, there is no universally accepted classification system.
Objective: To determine the interobserver agreement and intraobserver reproducibility of Ruedi and Allgower, AO, and Topliss et al. classification systems for tibial pilon fractures, with CT scans.
Method: Forty-seven CT scans of tibial pilon fractures were evaluated independently by 5 orthopaedic surgeons. Fractures were classified according to Ruedi and Allgower, AO and Topliss et al. types. Assessment was done on two occasions, eight weeks apart.
Results: The interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility for Ruedi and Allgower, AO and Topliss et al. classifications showed only moderate agreement. The interobserver agreement was dependent on the familiarity and specificity of the classification system.
Conclusion: Currently used classification systems for tibial pilon fracture have moderate interobserver and intraobserver agreements, even with the help of CT scans. Therefore Tibial pilon fracture classification still remains largely undetermined.
Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
What Is the Most Reliable Classification System to Assess Tibial Pilon Fractures?J Foot Ankle Surg. 2020 Jan-Feb;59(1):48-52. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2019.07.002. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2020. PMID: 31882147
-
Assessment of the AO/ASIF fracture classification for the distal tibia.J Orthop Trauma. 1997 Oct;11(7):477-83. doi: 10.1097/00005131-199710000-00004. J Orthop Trauma. 1997. PMID: 9334948
-
Impact of two- and three-dimensional computed tomography use on intraobserver and interobserver reliabilities of pilon fracture classification and treatment recommendation.Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019 Nov;105(7):1407-1412. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.07.011. Epub 2019 Sep 18. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019. PMID: 31542310
-
[Pilon fractures : Review of diagnostics and classification].Unfallchirurg. 2017 Aug;120(8):632-639. doi: 10.1007/s00113-017-0363-9. Unfallchirurg. 2017. PMID: 28567532 Review. German.
-
[Fractures of the tibial pilon. Long-term retrospective study of 51 fractures treated with open reduction and osteosynthesis].Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1998 Apr;84(2):180-8. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1998. PMID: 9775062 Review. French.
Cited by
-
New Classification and Its Value Evaluation for Atlantoaxial Dislocation.Orthop Surg. 2020 Aug;12(4):1199-1204. doi: 10.1111/os.12734. Epub 2020 Jul 25. Orthop Surg. 2020. PMID: 32710601 Free PMC article.
-
Case Report: A Rare Case Of Bilateral Tibial Plafond Fracture In A Young Soldier.J Orthop Case Rep. 2024 Sep;14(9):7-13. doi: 10.13107/jocr.2024.v14.i09.4710. J Orthop Case Rep. 2024. PMID: 39253676 Free PMC article.
-
Posterior Malleolar Fracture Assessment: An Independent Interobserver and Intraobserver Validation of Three Computed Tomography-Based Classifications.J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2023 Jan 9;7(1):e22.00258. doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-22-00258. eCollection 2023 Jan 1. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2023. PMID: 36622849 Free PMC article.
-
Assessment of inter and intra-observer variation of Leonetti and Tigani CT bases classification of tibial pilon fractures.Int J Burns Trauma. 2023 Apr 15;13(2):51-57. eCollection 2023. Int J Burns Trauma. 2023. PMID: 37215507 Free PMC article.
-
Use of Three-dimensional Printing for Tibial Pilon Fracture Diagnosis and Treatment.Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2024 Jun 22;59(3):e456-e461. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1785514. eCollection 2024 Jun. Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2024. PMID: 38911898 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical