Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2010 Dec 23;6(6):723-6.
doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2010.0526. Epub 2010 Jul 7.

Comparative analysis of marine ecosystems: international production modelling workshop

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparative analysis of marine ecosystems: international production modelling workshop

Jason S Link et al. Biol Lett. .

Abstract

Understanding the drivers that dictate the productivity of marine ecosystems continues to be a globally important issue. A vast literature identifies three main processes that regulate the production dynamics of such ecosystems: biophysical, exploitative and trophodynamic. Exploring the prominence among this 'triad' of drivers, through a synthetic analysis, is critical for understanding how marine ecosystems function and subsequently produce fisheries resources of interest to humans. To explore this topic further, an international workshop was held on 10-14 May 2010, at the National Academy of Science's Jonsson Center in Woods Hole, MA, USA. The workshop compiled the data required to develop production models at different hierarchical levels (e.g. species, guild, ecosystem) for many of the major Northern Hemisphere marine ecosystems that have supported notable fisheries. Analyses focused on comparable total system biomass production, functionally equivalent species production, or simulation studies for 11 different marine fishery ecosystems. Workshop activities also led to new analytical tools. Preliminary results suggested common patterns driving overall fisheries production in these ecosystems, but also highlighted variation in the relative importance of each among ecosystems.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Ecosystems studied at this workshop.

References

    1. Anderson P. J., Piatt J. F.1999Community reorganization in the Gulf of Alaska following ocean climate regime shift. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 189, 117–123 (doi:10.3354/meps189117) - DOI
    1. Beaugrand G., Brander K. M. S., Souissi L. J., Reid P. C.2003Plankton effect on cod recruitment in the North Sea. Nature 426, 661–664 (doi:10.1038/nature02164) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chassot E., Bonhommeau S., Dulvy N. K., Melin F., Watson R., Gascuel D., Le Pape O.2010Global marine primary production constrains fisheries catches. Ecol. Lett. 13, 495–505 (doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01443.x) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chavez F. P., Ryan J., Lluch-Cota S. E., Niquen M.2003From anchovies to sardines and back: multidecadal change in the Pacific Ocean. Science 299, 217–221 (doi:10.1126/science.1075880) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Daskalov G. M., Grishin A. N., Rodionov S., Mihneva V.2007Trophic cascades triggered by overfishing reveal possible mechanisms of ecosystem regime shifts. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 10 518–10 523 (doi:10.1073/pnas.0701100104) - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources